Archive for July, 2009
Positive month
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 31st, 2009
Well the curtain has drawn down on July and as it turned out to be an interesting month. I ended up doing a similar total to last year, but more notable was that my strike rate shot up into the high 80′s this month. It’s the first month that I have used the new market overview screen permanently. Coincidence, possibly, but in a long shallow declining trend this month sticks out like a sore thumb; I hope it continues into August.
My overriding memory of last year was the nightmare at York when the meeting was abandoned. Not the only races to be lost to the weather. I really hope that the same doesn’t occur this year. Fingers crossed.
I started investing with some vigour again this month and even took an up bet on the FTSE index at the start of the month. I’ve been following a long term sentiment indicator and it turned positive as we exited last month. It doesn’t send a signal out often but when it flashed last month I felt I didn’t have much to lose by following it. I’m not into market timing really, but this indicator only gives out signals years apart so I thought it made sense to pay attention. The FTSE has since risen 9% on the month! I think we have a long way to go potentially on the next leg up on the market, but I will wait for the current euphoria to die down before adding to my positions.
You may be interested to know we are currently experimenting with similar indicators in Bet Angel. There are a fair few differences between the way both markets act so I am not sure if we will find anything useful, but it’s worth a try.
Rounding error – Follow up
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 30th, 2009
Further my recent post about the rounding error, Betfair have been in touch. In fact, they gave me a response before I could raise it with them! I got a very detailed explanation that explains clearly how the error occurred.
To cut a long explanation short, the rounding down occurred because the £2000 was matched against a number of other exchange users with differing amounts at differing prices. Given the underlying way the bets were matched, on an individual basis with other users, some profits are rounded up others rounded down. I could have just as easily ended up 1p. Betfair didn’t gain the 1p it was some other exchange user.
Betfair assure me that nothing has changed from their end since the original process was launched back in 2000 and this manifestation is just a quirk of the existing system and the way bets are matched and settled.
I’d like thank Betfair for providing such a quick and comprehensive answer.
“Rounding” error
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 30th, 2009
OK, the concept of trading is laying at a lower price than you back at. But if you can’t do that, then the next best thing is to scratch your trade.
If I back £2000 at 3.18 and then lay that back at 3.18 for the same amount, what is the net result?
Zero, of course. But this doesn’t appear to be the case any longer? I can’t honestly see how you could get a rounding error on this simple calculation, but one appears to be occurring. I’ve seen others report the same issue so I’ve raised this with Betfair.

Silly scheduling
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 29th, 2009
The card looks rotten today. From 14:00 we have a race every five minutes and I suspect we potentially have some clashing on the cards. With Perth now lost to the weather we could have another problem. Not an ideal scenario at all but surely one that could have been improved with some better scheduling. And the horse racing industry is wondering why the money from levy is falling?
“Interesting” start
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 29th, 2009
An “interesting” start to the week. No sooner had I started my activity than my PC decided to reset itself, then it did it again, then the TV’s went, then all electricity was cut. A bit of a nightmare start. I ploughed on though, as I have back up systems and that gives me the ability to carry on in a disaster. On the next outage though, even the local mobile mast went down! Obviously there was a serious problem with the local network so I had to stop trading for a while and tread carefully.
Once I was sure things were returning to normal I stepped up and got into the day, but it was quite tough. The thing that stood out for me yesterday was that despite using pretty average stake sizes it was taking ages to get filled on anything. We tested various orders across the book but it just seemed that the fill rate was poor. We wondered just how much “real” money was being matched at times? It’s a little concerning as with such a high profile event, sponsored by Betfair, we were expecting some fireworks. Lets hope the rest of the week picks up.
Over all I managed to drag myself up to near £1300 by the end of the day, but the highlight was the feature race. On Monday, during my course, we all looked at this race and discussed exactly how it should trade. It turned out exactly as we expected and also turned out to be one of the lowest risk trades of the day. With the large amount of volume to hand on the race, this was just perfect and I hope everybody took the opportunity that was presented. Fingers crossed for the rest of the week.


Goodwood
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 28th, 2009
Sounds more like a stud farm than a racecourse!
But seriously, this should be an interesting week. I’ve had mixed results from Goodwood in the past but that’s probably a reflection on the one year I had a bit of a mare at Goodwood. Hopefully I wont see a repeat this week. Glorious Goodwood is an excellent week to learn about the markets. Over the course of the next five days you will get all manner of markets occurring from one end of the spectrum to the other. This will provide you a good chance to test, experiment and feel the difference between different markets.
Goodwood is one of my favourite race courses. Perched just north of Chichester you can climb Knights Hill and look down on the course and the wonderful surrounding countryside. If you fancy a round of Golf the golf club is only just around the corner and is very enjoyable and well maintained. When you tee off on the ninth, your line down the fair is Chichester cathedral! Its a really great day out so if you get the chance please go and visit it one day.

High speed scalping
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 25th, 2009
Thought you may like this video, scalping can be a bit hectic at times!
What’s next?
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 24th, 2009
The thing that has prompted this post, is the chat I had with a whole bundle of Bet Angel users on Monday night. I offered out an open invitation to talk about anything. Unfortunately at 11pm we ran out time, unable to answer all the 300 or so comments and questions. I will arrange another session in the future. One question was, “Were does it end, what’s next?” There is a natural endpoint for me, its linked to my investing.
When you invest, not trade, you are looking for yield. It’s the same as putting money into a savings account, you want to earn X% interest. The wonderful thing about investing in company shares is that you can earn your ‘interest’ and see your capital grow at the same time. When I invest, I am looking for that company to re-invest profit to grow the company and return any excess cash to me, the partial owner, as a dividend each year. You and I can sell each other bits of companies till the cow comes home, trading, but at the end of the day a company is worth only what it throws off in cash over time. So that is my focus.
As an example, I bought some shares in AG Barr in late 2004, nearly five years ago. I bought them at around £6 each. In the last five years they have moved up to near £13. That’s a nice return, but I have earned more than this because of the dividend payments. Dividend payments add £1.55 to my return. 25% of my purchase price has already been returned to me in the form of dividends. Next year the dividend yield, based on my purchase price, will probably reach somewhere near 7%. With an investment yield like that per year, there seems little reason to sell them. This is why I like longer term investing so much, as opposed to trading short term on the stock market. My only decision this year will be whether I want to sell AG Barr or not. If I hold I get paid for doing so, its a net positive position, even by doing nothing. Investing can also be scaled to billions.
In contrast, while your return on capital is likely to be high if you trade on any market, your ability to scale it is limited as it always involves some form of leverage. On exchanges, that scaling is smaller given the introduction of the premium charge, data charges etc. More importantly you will not earn anything in terms of a yield. Investing though compounds up at a brisk rate and compared to something that is limited in scale, it will over take it in double quick time. If there is excess capital to hand, investing and compounding it will soon produce an income without having to sit in front on a screen every day for hours.
Of course you need to get that excess capital in the first place, so don’t let it hold you up in anyway. It’s just another another goal to aim for. Much better to be a lender of capital than a borrower of it!
Red mist
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 23rd, 2009
It’s funny but some of my best trading occurs when the red mist descends. After the “injustice” of the 14:20 at Bath I am actually performing really well. I think this is because I get very aggressive in my trading.
Typically I recommend to people to take a break if they feel the red mist descending as it can really force your hand and cause you to make some chronic mistakes. My actions defying my advice.
I guess you have to trust your judgement and I guess I also have to understand whether I really need to lose a bucket of money to motivate myself! Anyhow, thought I’d share that with you.
Time to pull your act together Betfair
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 23rd, 2009
Another race failed to turn in play today, the 14:20 at Bath. This time, excuse the pun, I took a bath on my P&L.
I think I speak for a very large number of users, not just Bet Angel customers, when I say that Betfair really need to sort our their suspension and inplay process. The whole process, across a number of sports, seems to be in freefall. So many football matches and horse races in the last month have never been turned in play. It’s very frustrating and very costly to users who are relying on the inplay markets, as advertised. One or two glitches here and there can be forgiven, even expected, now and again but the size and scale of the recent problems obviously point to more serious issues.
I don’t know how people can confidently commit capital to markets that are, at best, becoming very erratic. I for one will scale back activity that relies on in-play markets until such time that I have some confidence that the problem is fixed. Part of that confidence will come from knowing what the issue is.
Explaining to customers what is going wrong will help them come to terms with the issues and may be a useful piece of PR. Explaining the issue, one that occurs with such regularity it seems, with the words, ‘Technical issue’ really isn’t good enough in my opinion. So please Betfair, instill some confidence and help us understand what keeps going wrong.
Swinging in the rain
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 23rd, 2009
Just checked out todays card before heading off to the Gym at lunch time. Today is one of the most swing oriented cards I have seen for a while. Not perfect, but certainly likely to be up there with some of the most volatile days of the year. If you like swing trading there should be some quality opportunities out there today, if you are only a scalper, watch out as it will be a volatile day.
What’s that racing system worth?
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 23rd, 2009
Roll up, I have a new system for you, for no effort and little skill you can bag £50k a year and Sir, for you today, it’s only, Not £99 but just £79. But hurry I am closing offers on Friday and I only have 20 left!
Hmm, I bet you heard that pitch before, it seems every day my inbox is accosted by offers telling me they have a foolproof system for sale. But if you actually successfully created an a,b,c formulaic, foolproof, net positive system how much would you sell it for?
Let’s say it was capable of being run by a monkey, as most of things are positioned, your first shot would be to get a monkey to run it, not you. Mr Monkey could sit there each day flicking through the racing papers, making a few selections and then putting your hard earned capital to use. Lets say we pay Mr Monkey £10k a year for his ‘efforts’. OK, now lets assume that after funding Mr Monkey, our system leaves us with £20k a year.
Coming from an investment background, generating £20k a year after costs means you can work out roughly how much you are willing to pay for that return. Let us put a margin of safety in first. We will be cautious and discount our potential earnings by half to £10k. With interest rates very low, lets assume want a generous 10% return on our capital per annum. Now we can divide £10k by 10%, this equals £100k. If we could outsource the work, we would be willing to invest £100k to return £10k. Perhaps not just once either! We could raise money from investors, offer to pay them a market beating 5% and use their money to leverage up the system.
So that £79 sounds like a absolute bargain doesn’t it, given that an investor would pay £100k for that income stream. Can you spot the flaw? Unfortunately, whichever way you look at it, everything requires work and some skill even given the best advice.
Understanding Risk
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 22nd, 2009
I’ve crossed paths with John Kay on a number of occasions, I guess this is because we often have approached things in a similar manner. I don’t know him as such, but have followed his work , attended some of his lectures and spoken to him. I thought this piece I read in a weekend FT recently was a decent thought provoking peice. It tells you a lot about the way people approach risk. It sums up quite nicely how I think and how I look at risk and how people are often fooled into the wrong decision.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/0632d418-67fc-11de-848a-00144feabdc0.html
It reminded me of a converstaion I had recently with a friend I met in the rush hour in London. “Shall we catch a cab?” he asked. To which I responded: -
“If we go on the Jubilee line theres a 70% chance we will probably have to wait for two trains I guess, or we could go south on the Bakerloo and its 90% certain to be clear, catch the Northern Line north and walk. If we took the Taxi it will cost extra but we can be sure of getting their on time. We’ll catch the taxi”. He laughed and said, “That’s you all over!” I think he was looking for a yes or no.
Reversed or not?
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 17th, 2009
Several people have emailed me to ask why on some videos the ladder interface is reversed and it is not in others? There is no right way to do this and it’s really down to personal preference and what you are trying to achieve. I had no real preference and vary it according to the strategy I am deploying. To explain what happens when you choose to reverse the ladder or not, I have produced a video for you: -
On the loose
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 17th, 2009
A good example yesterday of activity caused by on course activity. Skylla broke loose at the start and this caused quite a lot of movement in it’s market price. The camera was staring straight at Skylla when the handler let slip of the reins during a ‘frisky’ moment and Skylla took the chance to run to the start. Ryan Moore could only hold his head in despair.
Contrary to what you may think or have been told, the price on Skylla came in when it broke loose and only started to fly out when it was definite that it was running. There is a good explanation why this happened but it’s beyond a few paragraphs on the blog. As it was, Skylla ran really well and was only just edged out by a nose in the actual race itself.

Worst trade ever?
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 13th, 2009
I wonder if this was the worst trade ever, or maybe just a blinding cock up of some sort by somebody?
Anybody trading this market couldn’t have failed to notice the sudden appearance of a £100k order in the book. This person was desperate to get filled on the back side and the order persisted for ages. I can only speculate what happened here, as when I looked at the data I couldn’t clearly see any particular strategy behind it. I was so engrossed in taking out the price in front of the money I failed to grab an image. So thanks to the Bet Angel user who sent in this screen shot.
This image is a good illustration of how full market depth, traded price and other information can help you. If you were just looking at the three back or lay prices and nothing else you would have seen a completely different picture. If you have been trading without this data you may already be substantially behind Bet Angel users who have had this advantage for years. You can never have enough information to trade from!

The two grand race
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 11th, 2009
Ok not quite two grand and also it shouldn’t have been! But thanks to Betfair’s well documented problems this week, a failure to turn markets in play, I fluked a big gain on one race today. See below: -
To be honest I’d rather forgo the money and have the whole system working as it should do. It serves no one to have a faulty platform and it would be much better to be sure that you know what is going to happen next. I also take issue with the fact that Betfair were not correctly backdating “at inplay take sp” orders. A very errant approach in my opinion. While a bonus is nice it isn’t real and these things work both ways. Earlier in the day at the 15:00 at The Curragh, I got a big negative. I decided then not to risk anything further but the issue didn’t seem to be present at UK races so I got suckered at Nottingham. As luck would have it, the right horse won and I got the benefit. But that’s it for the moment, no more till I am confident that Betfair is working properly again.
Betfair quote ‘technical issues’ as the problem. I strongly suspect that it is the SP reconciliation process that is broken. I also suspect that Betfair are placing their own SP orders into the market at this moment. I can’t confirm this but from the evidence I have seen, the way the SP is shifting, this problem and the delayed SP reconciliation this evening make me suspect that this is what the problem is. I’ll ask Betfair and let you know what they say. Clarification on the issue would go some way to pacifying what must be a whole bundle of unhappy customers. I was lucky today to escape, but I suspect there are many out of pocket.
Buzzing
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 10th, 2009
After many years in the market it’s not often I get to feel great about a day but that’s how I feel after today’s session. I was in dialogue with a Bet Angel user at the start of the session and got off to a dodgy start. He reminded me that it would end up ok and that’s exactly what happened.
I was enjoying it so much I just blitzed through the card, including the Irish races, and managed to trade 47 markets on the day. I ended up with only two losers, one of them outside of my control. It was a very satisfying day!
This run and turn of events reminded me of something that somebody recently asked me. They asked if they should stop at a pre-set profit or loss for the day. I can’t imagine why you would do this? If you stop at a loss you will miss potential profitability later on, and limiting your profit is never a road to riches. I can’t imagine why anybody would adopt this sort of strategy.
At the end of the day it’s a numbers game and to make it work and tip things in your favour, you need to keep working those numbers. No amount of limiting losses or profits will help that, it’s what you do on each individual moment that matters.
Expensive problem
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 9th, 2009
This was the name of the horse that reared as it left the stalls in the first at Epsom this evening. I was waiting for a lay to get matched and hanging in there I had turned the lay to an SP order. As the fast pictures boys saw it l0ng before I the price shot out and the SP returned was dreadful. What was a nice profit turned into, well, an expensive problem!
Ashes
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 8th, 2009
I’m looking forward to the Ashes and if the markets are anything like the last time the Ashes were held in the UK, we could be in for a treat. I remember visiting Betfair’s offices just after the last test finished. It had turnover of £32m or something similar. There was a lot excitement and activity last time around.
I must admit to not having done much Cricket trading. It still remains a relatively untouched area for me. I have carefully modelled horse racing, soccer and tennis but cricket is still on the edge of my agenda.
I know it’s something I would like to get into and I know some excellent cricket traders, but unfortunately there are only 24 hours in the day. There are some good blogs out there so if you are interested in getting involved have a nose around them. I’ll see if I can get a list up at some point. For this series I may have a dabble but until I know what I am doing it will remain just that.
The only hint I can offer at the moment is that it seems the weather can be an important contributor to odds movement as well as the underlying score.
Another meeting abandoned
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 7th, 2009
Last week we had a meeting abandoned because they couldn’t get enough water on course. This week we appear to have too much. Uttoxeter has been abandoned this evening in another embarrassment for the racing industry. I’d understand the odd one but these ‘freak events’ do seem to occur with amazing regularity!
It’s been a really disjointed start to the week, I hope it gets better from here.
http://www.racingpost.com/news/horse-racing/waterlogged-uttoxeter-abandons-evening-card/605914/
7/7
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 7th, 2009
Most people know the significance of this date, but for a small group of traders this date has even more significance.
On that very day I was scheduled to do a talk in central London on guess what, trading on betting exchanges. Obviously, in the ensuing chaos, we all arrived a little late. A few of us had directly got caught up in the bombings but nobody was seriously hurt, just a few bumps and some confusion. While it may seem a bit bizarre now, none of us knew what had happened. The rumours at the time were an electrical fault and explosion. So with most people settled in, we just carried on as normal. There was the odd comment on how many sirens were going off. Most people had turned off their mobile phones to listen to the talk.
One person hadn’t though, me. My phone kept ringing, so after trying to ignore it, I eventually answered it. “Are you OK?” came the voice of my wife down the phone. Suddenly we all realised what was going on. About half way through the conversation the phone cut out, it would be the last time for a while that any of us would speak to our relatives. With Internet sites completely stuffed up as well, we were a bit clueless as to what was really happening.
I rolled up my sleeves and immediately went to seek advice, only to realise that most of London was scattering away from the centre however and as fast as they could. This was a little tricky as there were no buses, trains or taxis; it was foot traffic only. On eventually finding a policeman, he advised us to stay put till things were a little clearer. He didn’t know if it was a ‘normal’ bomb or a chemical attack. So, in true British fashion, we stayed put and just carried on. A very, very surreal experience.
We ended slightly early and set off on our walk across town. It was a strange experience, the whole place was completely quiet. Not a soul to be seen, only traffic lights blinking on and off to a non exist world. To add to the atmosphere, it started to rain, not just a little but a lot! A small group of us found an abandoned coffee shop and took refuge in it. Just then the mobile phone network sprung back into life and all the phones started ringing. It was an emotional time listening to the messages as they poured in from all over the world checking to see if we were OK.
Eventually we split up and I found my way to Waterloo station where the first trains were just starting to run again, under heavy security. I jumped on the train for a long and lonely journey home. It was really strange watching the news that night. I’d been there, but the scale and impact of it just hadn’t sunk in till I watched the news.
Spare some thoughts today for those affected by any unnecessary hatred. Have pity for those for whom hates forms a daily part of their life; whatever form it takes, not just terrorists. I guess its just a utopian dream to think that maybe people can just get on with each other for once?
Anyhow, this morning, four years on, I will be taking some time out to contemplate those that were not so lucky four years ago. The timing of this post will appear on the Internet at the exact time the first bomb went off. Please take a moment to remember to mark the anniversary at some point today.
Great end to Wimbledon
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 6th, 2009
What a fantastic tournament that was. Opportunities seemed to pop out of the tennis court all over the place and we finished with an epic final. £53m was traded on the final, £49m on Federer!
There were several opportunities to lay Federer at short odds and as the match wore on your could easily see it heading for a fifth set. During that fifth set it was very even, but as we strayed into the final stages of that titanic battle you could see Roddick weakening a little bit and Federer retaining his composure. I felt so sorry for Roddick who had really put in so much into these two weeks. At the end of the day Federer broke Roddick just once during the match, but that was enough for the championship. Before the match I went back and listened to an interview that Roddick did a couple of years ago with Jonathan Ross. I remember them talking about grass, clay and Federer. It turned out to be a useful hint of what was to happen.
With Roddick weakening during the latter stages of the fifth set you could easily see the market discounting this into the price of Federer. I eventually jumped on board Federer at 1.43 and just minutes later it was all over. Probably one of the better trades I had made for the tournament and it just happened to be the last.
My confidence in tennis trading is now on a high after such a decent French Open and Wimbledon. I’m glad I’ve put so much effort into the markets in the last couple of years. If you haven’t traded Tennis before, then give it a try. It’s great fun!

Opinion
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 6th, 2009
Thank you for reading this blog. I trust you get something out of reading it and based on the tons of emails I receive, a lot of you do. That’s pleasing to know.
You should always welcome opinion and whether you agree with it or not, its important if it provokes thought or debate. Asking “why?” is a great human gift. However, if opinion isn’t voiced for constructive debate, it serves nobody. Let me tell you where my opinions are sourced.
I draw next to nothing from the commercial side of my activity in the market. I prefer to re-invest that money into future projects. For me, actually using exchanges has always been central to everything I do, in fact, its a passion. If it wasn’t a passion I wouldn’t sit here playing with odds models shoveling millions a week through the markets. In fact, if I had no other interests and didn’t earn a penny from it, or anything else, I would probably still be sat here probing the market. That’s how Bet Angel came to life. Back when it was created there was nothing with the features I needed, nobody was convinced they were needed, so I had to design the concepts myself. A lot of features you see in the market, even some of those introduced by Betfair first appeared on Bet Angel.
Having successfully navigated the markets since they were formed nearly ten years ago, I’m bound to voice what I think. My opinion comes from actually being here and doing it, and that is what drives my thought processes and comments, nothing else.
Balls up at Bellewstown
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 4th, 2009
Inbetween the two UK evenings races I tuned into the Irish racing. Saw a horse being led to the start. Suddenly the race is off, oh dear, it looks like they went without him. He was very heavily backed and there could be a lot of fall out from this one! I put a trade in but reversed it when I wasn’t sure what was going on. As I type, 40 minutes later, there still seems to be no decision as to whether the horse was a non runner, runner or whether the race should be void.
The racing industry does seem to throw up these odd situations with amazing regularity.
Look over your shoulder
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 3rd, 2009
When trading it’s easy to get carried away with a move in the market. The prices is rising and you instinctively want to follow it as it charges off in one direction or another. You sit there and ponder your move then make the decision to jump in. Just as you do it goes the other way and you sit there waiting for it to rebound into profit, it continues to fall and then you can’t stand it any more and cut out. No sooner do you cut out than the price moves the other way, you jump back in and then you find you exit too early as the price soars off in the direction you picked. At that point you look over your shoulder as you could swear that somebody was watching you and waiting for you to click that button!
Why does this happen?
The answer lies in a little bit of psychology, namely fear and greed. I’ve published this image before, a couple of years ago in the newsletter, but I think it illustrates very well why people get into the market at the wrong time, exit at the wrong time and then fail to take their full profits.

Initially as the price moves, you feel a need to jump on a price movement, fearing you may have missed out. It turns out you were too late and the move has already happened and as the price falls back below your entry point, you bail out. This time you get in again and as the price rises you get nervous so you close your position, to be safe. Of course it sails well past your exit point and typically, if you have been in and out already, your hand is forced again by your previous memory of your prior unsuccessful entry.
This graphic illustrates these issues better than words but the summary is, let the market be your slave, not your master. Don’t follow it, try and be contrary.
What has worked at Wimbledon?
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 2nd, 2009
Laying short priced favourites has worked well this in the tournament. Also, several matches have thrown up some wonderful trading opportunities to do this not just once but many times over. Hewitt and Roddick yesterday was another great trading match.
Putting that aside, one of the best tricks this tournament has been to listen to the ex-legends of the game. It’s remarkable how well they have called a lot of the matches. Today is potentially another example of this. Navratilova said that Williams vs Dementieva would be a tight match, spot on. She also hinted that the other semi-final would not be so tight. So bear that in mind when you start looking at the second semi-final.
Tennis trading for dummies
Posted by Peter Webb in Bet Angel on July 1st, 2009
Thanks to the unusual scoring system, tennis matches experience some of the wildest swings you will see in any inplay market and are worth a dabble even if you have never done it before. It can be pretty low risk as well.
I’ve worked for ages to model Tennis matches accurately. I’ve got to the point wehre I now have the ability to look ahead to see where the odds should be given any scenario. While this is useful, it’s not a pre-requistie to successful Tennis trading. In fact, if you are starting out it’s really quite simple to get your first successful trade under your belt.
Even at short odds the majority of odds drift in-play. This generally occurs because of a break of serve occuring at some point, or in the case of a very short priced favourtie a failure to break. If you don’t get either then the odds will obviously shorten. If you are at laying at low odds, then you have already framed your downside. So by using low stakes and laying the favorite at short odds at the start of the match, you have limited downside and lots of potential for upside. You are very likely to be able to trade out profitably.
Taking a bit more care to qualify or watch the start of the match and your strike rate will go up. Timing your exit when the favourite comes back into the match will allow you to get a better exit. Even if you use little skill you shouldn’t find yourself losing match after match, subject to your exit of course! From there you can build out to more adventurous strategies. Make sure you use Guardian as this will allow you to trade more than one match at the same time with stop losses and all the usual functions.

Andy Murray - Tennis traders dream!
