Welcome to the Bet Angel Professional Community

Attack on bookmakers by Harriet Harm-Men

A place to discuss anything.

Postby Ferru123 » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:36 pm

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/ ... -harman.do

God help us if that nutter ever becomes PM!

Would she prefer bookmaking to be run by the criminal underworld?

Jeff

User avatar
Ferru123
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 5485
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:51 pm
  

Postby LeTiss 4pm » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:43 pm

She pointed to her own Camberwell and Peckham constituency, where one shopping area has eight betting shops in two streets. And as further evidence that poor areas are being targeted, she highlighted previous research from Tottenham MP David Lammy that indicated Newham has three times as many bookmakers as Richmond-upon-Thames.

That may well be so, but it's probably balanced out by residents of Richmond being three times more likely to have access to various online accounts.

The point she's making though has some validity. I started my career as a Ladbrokes betting shop manager, and invariably the best performing shops were ones in working class areas.

User avatar
LeTiss 4pm
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 1973
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Ocean Village
  

Postby hgodden » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:46 pm

Tbh I agree with what she says, its about time politicians started looking at the roulette machines and the people who are addicted to them.

User avatar
hgodden
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 1344
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:13 pm
  

Postby Ferru123 » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:48 pm

I'm sure that's the case, but IMHO it's not for government to tell people how to spend their own money.

And if you shut down high street bookies, all that will happen is that people will place their bets online, and thousands of betting shop staff will end up on the dole queue...

Jeff

LeTiss 4pm wrote:The point she's making though has some validity. I started my career as a Ladbrokes betting shop manager, and invariably the best performing shops were ones in working class areas.

User avatar
Ferru123
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 5485
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:51 pm
  

Postby Ferru123 » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:54 pm

But the answer isn't legislation. That's a bit like saying that we should ban alcohol because of its negative effects on a minority of drinkers.

If people want to waste their money, they'll find a way. If you get rid of or restrict roulette machines, they'll try online poker or something else.

Jeff

hgodden wrote:Tbh I agree with what she says, its about time politicians started looking at the roulette machines and the people who are addicted to them.

User avatar
Ferru123
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 5485
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:51 pm
  

Postby hgodden » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:16 pm

I doubt it. Many of the people using the roulette machines could barely operate a computer. A lot of them go in there after cashing their giro and half of its gone in a few minutes - those machines lose people money at a faster rate than any other form of gambling I can think of.

I can't buy the whole argument that other things should be legal just because alcohol is. If it was discovered now it would probably be banned. You can argue about the relative good / bad points about various 'activities' but I can't see a great deal of good coming from those machines - you don't exactly need a lot of people working in the bookies to run them and I don't hear people complaining about the poor souls who used to make and fill up cigarette machines which you don't see so much

User avatar
hgodden
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 1344
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:13 pm
  

Postby Ferru123 » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:30 pm

hgodden wrote:I doubt it. Many of the people using the roulette machines could barely operate a computer.

Perhaps, but they'd be motivated learners! ;)

hgodden wrote:I can't buy the whole argument that other things should be legal just because alcohol is.

What is the point of banning something? You deny the taxman money, honest and hardworking people lose their jobs, you glamourise the thing you ban, and you play into the hands of the criminal underworld.

hgodden wrote:If it was discovered now it would probably be banned.

So would the car - that's not a compelling argument. :)

hgodden wrote:you don't exactly need a lot of people working in the bookies to run them

I remember you writing that a bookie you knew made far more money from his slot machines than from horses.

If you removed the roulette machines, it would probably cost lots of jobs. And let's face it, if Harperson were PM with a decent majority, she wouldn't stop there. She clearly doesn't like bookmakers, and would probably ban them outright if she could...

Jeff

User avatar
Ferru123
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 5485
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:51 pm
  

Postby Yantraman » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:32 pm

I wonder, in % terms, just how much is turned over in shops in relation to the all betting mediums. (online etc).

If you want to tackle gambling, your online companies are surely your first port of call - the visible fronts such as high st shops are just easy targets for politicians who are more interested in making an apparent visible impact than a real impact.

My bookies only ever seems to be frequented by older (50+) men.

User avatar
Yantraman
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:30 pm
  

Postby andyfuller » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:34 pm

I feel odd saying it but I agree with Harriet :o

The wider social issues these kind of things cause can be huge.

If you walk around Newmarket the number of betting shops is just crazy, there must be at least 6 if not more Ladbrokes alone!

Walk past these shops and people are piling their money into these kind of machines at an alarming rate.

The problem with saying people should be free to spend their money as they wish is that a lot of people in this country are just stupid and actually need guidance/help/precautions as they are unable to do so for themselves.

The machines don't create a lot of jobs at all imo and if people weren't putting their money in to them they would spend it else where offsetting the loss of jobs and perhaps creating more.

User avatar
andyfuller
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:23 pm
  

Postby Ferru123 » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:35 pm

Ditto the ones I've used.

In the bookies I've been in, I've been just about the only customer who thought in decimal odds and had to convert them to traditional odds!

It's like stepping back in time! :lol:

Jeff

Yantraman wrote: My bookies only ever seems to be frequented by older (50+) men.

User avatar
Ferru123
Archangel Professional
Archangel Professional
 
Posts: 5485
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:51 pm
  

Next

Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login Form