Welcome to the Bet Angel Professional Community
by CaerMyrddin » Wed May 16, 2012 1:21 pm
Me too.
It's pointless carryong NSW as a loss leader cos no other states going to want to see their possible revenue go to NSW they'll want it themselves.
The opposite may be on the cards, NSW revenue go to the other States, but we'll have to wait and see..
-

CaerMyrddin
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:47 am
by rubysglory » Thu May 17, 2012 11:40 am
Betfair Australia really need not operate from within Australia at all. OK, they took out an Australian license to be seen to be doing the right thing, but there is nothing stopping them from moving their operation to somewhere like perhaps Vanuatu.Yes, as a prudent business measure Betfair know they should support and be seen to be actively supporting their business base - the racing industry, but surely the time has now arrived to withhold such support. Even if they were to end up paying a similar fee to the resident governing body ( I understood that Vanuatu's turnover tax rate is now 1.5% - but I stand corrected - anybody ?) , it would not be being paid to 'Racing Australia' . Play the ' OK - we will pay your fees game ' , 'just not to you'. Make them bleed for a bit. Perhaps then the reality will hit home that 0.50% of something is better than 1.5% of nothing. Call their bluff boys and have it out once and for all !
rg
-

rubysglory
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:02 am
by Galilee66 » Fri May 18, 2012 4:10 am
G'day RG,
I agree entirely - there is nothing to be gained by BF for them to hold an Australian licence - in fact, all it does is restrict Aus BF users in terms of the ridiculous legislation banning in play trading on the internet.
In my view, BF should surrender their Aus licence and simply operate from another base - UK, Malta or Timbuctoo - so long as they are able to do so viably.
I agree that they tried to do the right thing in relation to paying an appropriate fee to racing in Aus - and, if they were to operate from a base outside Aus and not be constrained in any way by arguments over access to Aus racing fields they would surely prosper, as the increase in in play trading/betting on sports events would be huge.
Let's hope BF management takes a very strategic view of what's happening and make some courageous decisions.
I would welcome the opportunity to trade on BF without the restrictions imposed by the ludicrous legislation that allows me to trade in play on the telephone - but not on the internet.
So, if any BF managers are reading this thread - take courage and pull the pin on your Australian operation.
cheers
G66
-

Galilee66
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:07 am
by Euler » Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:28 pm
I can now confirm that Betfair are contacting UK based customers to ask them to stop trading on Austrailian races.
The guy I spoke to was very pleasant and explained in detail the reason for the call. He also mentioned figures which I wont repeat on here of customers affected and so on.
He also mentioned how much Betfair 'lost' because of my activity last week. I told him Betfair didn't lose anything given my premium charge in the UK came to around four times that amount therefore they should let me continue as a highly profitable customer. They declined that offer.
-

Euler
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 6151
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:39 pm
- Location: Bet Angel HQ
-
by andyfuller » Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:01 pm
So just to confirm you have been told to stop Peter, is it just NSW races or all Oz races?
Also can you expand on the reasons he gave as to why they were asking you to stop? Or is it just you cost them money on those markets so they don't want you even though you probably provide a lot of liquidity?
-

andyfuller
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:23 pm
by mugsgame » Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:08 pm
I saw this coming, so I stopped trading on NSW races a couple of weeks back. I haven't had the call yet.
-

mugsgame
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:41 am
by Euler » Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:23 pm
They told me they couldn't support my custom as I lost them money (even though I didn't). I'm a bit suspicious though. They now have the sportsbook so why not blanket ban the exchange on NSW races. Why not just make them sportsbook only. As it is, it looks from an external viewpoint like they are just trying to shut profitable accounts, doesn't it?
-

Euler
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 6151
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:39 pm
- Location: Bet Angel HQ
-
by mugsgame » Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:24 pm
Are we talking NSW ban or ALL OZ Euler?
-

mugsgame
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:41 am
by Euler » Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:39 pm
NSW but I think others will follow suit.
-

Euler
- Archangel Professional

-
- Posts: 6151
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:39 pm
- Location: Bet Angel HQ
-
by Photon » Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:22 pm
I've had a call also albeit as a gentle reminder that my yield is low and I'm costing them money so I will have to change the way I bet in the NSW markets otherwise they will have to stop me placing bets in these markets. Just like Euler the guy I spoke to was nice (it was the same guy who phoned me few days earlier offering tickets to their box) and said it was a first warning and they will have to assess. It didn't sounded too threatning but I think I will have to approach NSW differently.
-

Photon
-
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:14 pm
Return to Australian
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests