Who says trading dogs is a waste of time?

[Euler]

Open minds find opportunities, closed one's problems. I know what I want to be.

I looked at the thread and thought, I should revisit greyhounds after seven years or so. I could have easily dismissed it and walked away, but I'd be poorer for doing so. I'm glad I revisted it.

[stu410]

I don't know what to make of this thread in all honesty.

I was reading it having my own doubts over the time, especially with the many consecutive posts from the OP showing different race screenshots. It sparked my cynicism.

FWIW, though, if they are faked, if this chap is having to do that to feel good about things, then he should be pitied really. I don't think we should all jump on the bandwagon, but neither should we 'feed the troll' as it were. Probably best the thread is closed and a generic Greyhounds discussion post opened, perhaps. I certainly got the itch to try and crack automated greyhound trading after this thread, so it's at least achieved that.

Never think

[Abraquay]

Are they still using meat / pork pies to slow the greyhounds down ?
Just been reading a topic from a few years ago.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9842

[oscar123]

If you were inspired by this thread to give automated greyhound trading a go,and things didn't go very well for you, it must leave a bit of a bad taste to know that the results were being faked using practise mode.

Reading back through the thread, the author does make numerous mentions about how well he is doing, no mention of practise mode then. Inspired, or not, it does also show that you also need to exercise some caution when reading about what others are doing when trading. I know I was taken in by all this, I'm sure others were too.

[stu410]

In this category, a king, masters recognize others lie...''cybernet69''

[Euler]

It was actually this thread: -

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=11654

That really kicked off the automated Greyhound discussion.

[Sovereign]

In this category, a king, masters recognize others lie...''cybernet69''

Yes, there's some irony in the fact that one of the OP's critics on here (and I am not defending him) is someone who was called out for the very same antics in a thread three down from this one on this very forum.

Again, to be pitied, really.

[cybernet69]

In this category, a king, masters recognize others lie...''cybernet69''

Yes, there's some irony in the fact that one of the OP's critics on here (and I am not defending him) is someone who was called out for the very same antics in a thread three down from this one on this very forum.

Again, to be pitied, really.

Am I being accused of something ?

[welshboy06]

In this category, a king, masters recognize others lie...''cybernet69''

Yes, there's some irony in the fact that one of the OP's critics on here (and I am not defending him) is someone who was called out for the very same antics in a thread three down from this one on this very forum.

Again, to be pitied, really.

I must've missed this? Link?

[stu410]

In this category, a king, masters recognize others lie...''cybernet69''

Yes, there's some irony in the fact that one of the OP's critics on here (and I am not defending him) is someone who was called out for the very same antics in a thread three down from this one on this very forum.

Again, to be pitied, really.

Am I being accused of something ?

No, to blame, get inspired

[stu410]

Mark,

You understand wrong

[stu410]

cybernet69 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:23 pm
stu410 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:15 pm
Thanks Mark
I sent you are file.

Do not share.
Mark is master and my idol..thanks and thanks.

to see

[Sovereign]

In this category, a king, masters recognize others lie...''cybernet69''

Yes, there's some irony in the fact that one of the OP's critics on here (and I am not defending him) is someone who was called out for the very same antics in a thread three down from this one on this very forum.

Again, to be pitied, really.

I must've missed this? Link?

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=11654&start=70

I'm just going by what my understanding is of the latter part of this thread. I may have misunderstood, in which case cybernet69 has my humble and unreserved apologies.

That said, I shall bow out of the discussion at this point. I hope the OP finds true and real success.

[spreadbetting]

i'd forgotten about that thread, Sovereign Just shows you can never really trust anyone especially when they're happy to post one lot of pnl's but not back it up with a shot from the website. It's always hard to maintain lies for too long no matter how many winky smileys they stick up

[Naffman]

Just a couple of millimetres of orange has caused this

I always thought it was strange how he was winning £500 a day yet his screenshots were only showing £1 wins...

Anyway at least it has brought greyhound racing to everyone's attention; and I'm sure a successful bot on those markets might work for US and Aus markets that behave quite similar!