For a lot of time I have struggled myself searching for the best tool for making predictive statistical analisis to try to reach the accurates odds a match should have, and then try to estrapolate the value from the odds that other players were offering.
Then I came to the conclusion that no one is better than the Bookmaker's statistical analisy... but so many times I have seen a lot of bookmakers which offered a tennis player or a football team at a ridiculous overpriced odd... so I was thinking ''Why are they overpricing this player so much?''... ''How wrong are their satistical tools?''
Anyway it's a bad argument... because thanks to statistical models, they will win in the long run, no matter if a player seems overpriced to me in a particular moment. If the software has calculated that odd, it's because matematically that's the odd of winnning for this player (minus the house edge)
So i was thinking to trust much more the bookmaker's prematch odds and trusting less the bookmaker's inplay odds because the inplay odds are gathered only thanks to the volume of bets made by bettors... so if the bookmaker will see that the volume of bets is much more on a team rather than the other one, they will reduce and increase the odds properly (to ensure themselves a sure profit, no matter how the game will end up)
Whilst the prematch odds are gathered thanks to a good statistical/matematical analisy because the first bettors who bet prematch are more important for a bookmaker, because at first glance they don't have a real volume.. so they have to be the more accurate as possible to guess the odds of a match.... so the first prematch odds can be seen as a fundamental point of resistence/support in case then inplay the odds would move from this value
My idea is that during the match the odds will often came back to the the odd's prematch value made by bookmakers, because they are made upon sofisticate quantitaive analisy tool
Am I right, what's your opinion?
General discussion : Comparing bookmakers for odds
If you think bookies are always right the best advice is to give up betting. Bookies are often wrong and the proof of it is in the diverse odds you sometimes get for the same event.
Software can accurately calculate probabilities in fixedprobability games but not on sporting events.
The reason tennis odds inplay often come back to prematch odds is because it is mathematically impossible not to unless the favourite dominates the the betting goes one way  have you not noticed by now that the odds fluctuate?
The prematch odds have little relevance once the match has started  what's happening on court is for important. I'm currently working on a VBA program to simulate 1000's of games and calculate what the probabilities of winning would be if the player's won random points based on a chosen winning serve percentage for each player, but it's more of an exercise, I don't know how useful it will be.
Software can accurately calculate probabilities in fixedprobability games but not on sporting events.
The reason tennis odds inplay often come back to prematch odds is because it is mathematically impossible not to unless the favourite dominates the the betting goes one way  have you not noticed by now that the odds fluctuate?
The prematch odds have little relevance once the match has started  what's happening on court is for important. I'm currently working on a VBA program to simulate 1000's of games and calculate what the probabilities of winning would be if the player's won random points based on a chosen winning serve percentage for each player, but it's more of an exercise, I don't know how useful it will be.
Last edited by Derek27 on Sat Jul 07, 2018 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

 Posts: 189
 Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:23 pm
Derek27 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:15 pmIf you think bookies are always right the best advice is to give up betting. Bookies are often wrong and the proof of it is in the diverse odds you sometimes get for the same event.
Software can accurately calculate probabilities in fixedprobability games but not on sporting events.
The reason tennis odds inplay often come back to prematch odds is because it is mathematically impossible not to unless the favourite dominates the the betting goes one way  have you not noticed by now that the odds fluctuate?
The prematch odds have little relevance once the match has started  what's happening on court is for important. I'm currently working on a VBA program to simulate 1000's of games and calculate what the probabilities of winning would be if the player's won random points based on a chosen winning serve percentage for each player, but it's more of an exercise, I don't know how useful it will be.
I have red the blog of a tennis trader. He said:
''I always use to see the bookmaker's odds, because they are the most accurate, they spent a lot of time with their statistical department on odds''
I would say that the prematch odds, are realistically and statistically the most accurate odds Dereck... I please understand my tought:
The bookmaker have the most sofisticated software to calculate odds, they don't have an exange (back or lay) so the first odds they give must be the most accurate as possibile
Imagine a match Juventus VS Livorno
What about if they would give to juventus an odd of 1.05 and X2 for Livorno would be priced at an odd of 40?
Well if a lot of bettors back X2 livorno for 40 and imagine if Livorno would really end up with a drawn (X) then the bookmaker would take a big hit.....
During the live match is a different thing instead, because the bookmaker are used to balance the odds checking the volume of the bets... so if there would be a lot of volume of bets for X2 Livorno at the price of 40, then the Bookmakers will decrease the odd to an odd that generates a profit for them anyway, not matter how the match will end up... ok?
I am saying that during the match the odds are NOT based on statistical parameters, but on the volume of bets.
So, if you would like to have the most accurate statistical odds , you should have to check odds set by bookmakers PRE.match
I am not saying those are the real odds, but those are the most (statistical) accurate
Since they are the most accurate from a statistical point of wiev, they can be seen as an important point of support / resistence... as a mean ..... as average mean.... for example if the odds goes too far from this mean you'll know that it's time to back / lay
Example: X2 livorno drops from 40 prematch to 10 in play... well it's time to lay because it's gone too much far from the standard deviation set up by bookmaker odd (40) and most likley it will come back to the mean
Bookies often contract statisticians to develop software and compile the probabilities/odds for football.Lucacrebbe wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:13 amThe bookmaker have the most sofisticated software to calculate odds, they don't have an exange (back or lay) so the first odds they give must be the most accurate as possibile
My brother's a statistician who's often done such work, so bookies don't have the most sophisticated software  my brother has, together with the mathematical knowhow. There are clever people on both sides of the betting counter!
Bookies also have the disadvantage of having to price up every match, whereas bettors can be more selective. The proof of the pudding is in the number of arbing opportunities, which by definition means that the bookies are making mistakes. My brother places quite sophisticated bets, backing teams to be promoted or relegated and counter spread bets, not quite arbing but getting positions where he gets long odds on eventualities that should be oddson.
During a match the odds are not just determined by the volume of bets but what's going on on the pitch.Lucacrebbe wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:13 amDuring the live match is a different thing instead, because the bookmaker are used to balance the odds checking the volume of the bets... so if there would be a lot of volume of bets for X2 Livorno at the price of 40, then the Bookmakers will decrease the odd to an odd that generates a profit for them anyway, not matter how the match will end up... ok?
I am saying that during the match the odds are NOT based on statistical parameters, but on the volume of bets.
...
Example: X2 livorno drops from 40 prematch to 10 in play... well it's time to lay because it's gone too much far from the standard deviation set up by bookmaker odd (40) and most likley it will come back to the mean
If "Livorno" drop from 40 prematch to 10 inplay, whether or not it's time to lay depends, amongst other things, on the score. What if they're two goals up at halftime?
At half time the prematch odds are of little more than interest. Outsiders sometimes win, in which case they reach 1.01, so you have to reassess the situation.

 Posts: 189
 Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:23 pm
Could you please explain in a simpler way this? I have not understood it
It's similar to arbing, only one bet is with a regular bookie, the other is a spread bet. For example, he might back a team to get relegated and then place a spread bet on the number of goals they score in the season, when he's calculated the probability of both bets losing is very small for his potential reward.
He basically scans the betting markets for all sports and finds the flawed odds, then works out a way to secure a profit.
He basically scans the betting markets for all sports and finds the flawed odds, then works out a way to secure a profit.

 Posts: 316
 Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:47 pm
Sounds similar to the approach I will deliberately take to trading some selections  essentially leave yourself with a bet, but one at much better odds than there would have been by simply placing a 'bet'.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 8:19 amIt's similar to arbing, only one bet is with a regular bookie, the other is a spread bet. For example, he might back a team to get relegated and then place a spread bet on the number of goals they score in the season, when he's calculated the probability of both bets losing is very small for his potential reward.
He basically scans the betting markets for all sports and finds the flawed odds, then works out a way to secure a profit.
When spread betting you have no choice because your potential return is variable. I guess it's a case of comparing worst case / likely /best case scenarios.stueytrader wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 11:01 amSounds similar to the approach I will deliberately take to trading some selections  essentially leave yourself with a bet, but one at much better odds than there would have been by simply placing a 'bet'.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 8:19 amIt's similar to arbing, only one bet is with a regular bookie, the other is a spread bet. For example, he might back a team to get relegated and then place a spread bet on the number of goals they score in the season, when he's calculated the probability of both bets losing is very small for his potential reward.
He basically scans the betting markets for all sports and finds the flawed odds, then works out a way to secure a profit.

 Posts: 189
 Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:23 pm
Where can I do spread betting? How is the revenue? I immagine it works just like the futures.. you choose up or down... in this case ''relegate to Serie B'' or ''it remains into Serie A''Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 8:19 amIt's similar to arbing, only one bet is with a regular bookie, the other is a spread bet. For example, he might back a team to get relegated and then place a spread bet on the number of goals they score in the season, when he's calculated the probability of both bets losing is very small for his potential reward.
He basically scans the betting markets for all sports and finds the flawed odds, then works out a way to secure a profit.
Then he hedges his spread bet with another bet, on the number of the goal.
Which tecnique does he use to see that the odds are flawed and they have an advantage for your brother?

 Information

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests