Looks a bargain!
P/E ratio - 6.5 to 8.3
Expected dividend yield - 6.1pc to 7.7pc
Dividend cover - Two times
Interest cover - Four times
Leverage - 65pc
Royal Mail float
Royal Mail shares 'seven times over-subscribed'
No surprise really, just have to wait for a paltry allocation now. I would imagine you will see institutions buying in when it floats.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24462388
No surprise really, just have to wait for a paltry allocation now. I would imagine you will see institutions buying in when it floats.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24462388
It will be interesting to see how they calculate the scaling back.
If you apply for £750 you may get the lot, but if you go for £50K it will probably be a fraction of that or maybe even nothing!
Mid point on the IG quote is up to £4.04 just hope I get a few.
If you apply for £750 you may get the lot, but if you go for £50K it will probably be a fraction of that or maybe even nothing!
Mid point on the IG quote is up to £4.04 just hope I get a few.
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
hardly surprising that they're massively over-subscribed given the current interest rate environment, and the fact that public assets have historically been sold off on the cheap.
investors have no cause for complaint - they've been given masses of public money (indirectly) since the financial crisis started.
investors have no cause for complaint - they've been given masses of public money (indirectly) since the financial crisis started.
Small investors will be favoured in the privatisation of the Royal Mail, at the expense of those seeking a large allocation, the BBC has learned.
Anyone who subscribed for the minimum entitlement of £750 will receive 100% of their application, according to BBC business editor Robert Peston.
But those who have applied for £10,000 worth of shares or more, will not receive any, he said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24471622
Anyone who subscribed for the minimum entitlement of £750 will receive 100% of their application, according to BBC business editor Robert Peston.
But those who have applied for £10,000 worth of shares or more, will not receive any, he said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24471622
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
UPDATE 1740
The allocation of shares turns out to be very simple. If you've applied for up to £10,000 of shares, you will get £750 worth of shares. It is no more complicated than that.
And the appetite from investment institutions for these things turns out to be enormous. They put up money worth a staggering 20 times the value of the shares on offer to them.
So on my calculation, retail and institutional investors offered £27bn for shares priced at £1.7bn (as I mentioned earlier, retail investors offered 7 times the value of shares allocated to them).
The argument about whether Royal Mail was priced too cheaply will run and run.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24470086
The allocation of shares turns out to be very simple. If you've applied for up to £10,000 of shares, you will get £750 worth of shares. It is no more complicated than that.
And the appetite from investment institutions for these things turns out to be enormous. They put up money worth a staggering 20 times the value of the shares on offer to them.
So on my calculation, retail and institutional investors offered £27bn for shares priced at £1.7bn (as I mentioned earlier, retail investors offered 7 times the value of shares allocated to them).
The argument about whether Royal Mail was priced too cheaply will run and run.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24470086
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Private investors cashing out - 49.2% of all trades in RMG so far today have been for 227 shares. Average price has been 445.15p
Or unless you're a hedge fund and are allowed to shovel up loads of them. No wonder the city makes up nearly a third of tory fundingLagos wrote:There is something quite pleasing about that, everyone got the same unless you did multiple applications or were greedy.
I think it's been interesting watching the debate about the float.
Lots of people saying don't buy it, it's ours already. But so is nearly £2Tr in liabilities but people don't seem to care much for taking responsibility for that side of the national balance sheet.
Lots of people saying don't buy it, it's ours already. But so is nearly £2Tr in liabilities but people don't seem to care much for taking responsibility for that side of the national balance sheet.
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
How banks broke promises and raked in a £323m fortune
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ro ... 26885.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ro ... 26885.html
every man and his dog knew that the shares were being sold on the cheap - the banks got preferential treatment and then flipped them. the City's "talent" is for lining their own pockets at the expense of taxpayers, real businesses and the real economy....big investors who were offered extra shares in a “gentleman’s agreement” to stay in for the long term sold them almost instantly at a vast profit