Jeez Si that was a year ago....I've wised up since.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:41 pmWhy does this happen? Without an underlying reason it's hard to believe it's any more than normal variance.
You don't need to know why or even if it is going to persist.
1.If it is then great.
2.If it's just regular day afterall, then the std ups and downs make it a wash.
3.If it's actually the opposite kind of day that's a problem, but after 1 or 2 you'd lose confidence (score?) on the fact it was a 'backing or laying day''.
I was overthinking it rather than looking at outcomes. Nothing is certain, so in the above just try and make 3 < 1 with appropriate money management (stopping the losses where teh reverse is happening) and you're on the right side.
"you often get days with a bias of strong backing or laying in the market" is the part I accept is fact, or he wouldn't have said it!
Knowing why isn't top of my todo list and can only ever be speculation, but crowd psychology is a funny thing.
).
Neither does cutting for a guaranteed loss, when there's potential for a retracement. I agree that taking lots of heat on the majority of entries; means the entry is indeed pretty shite. But improving that entry, could, completely eradicate the original edge.
My bot was on the wrong end of a late move but only losing 44c (predominantly backing)on that express train is a win I reckon. 
. Horse botty looking even more beautiful 
Stored values and signals=awesome capability to put bots on a string. ...I could be doing this for [more] years 
