superfrank wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:30 am
Vaz0202 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:49 pm
I might be wrong here but I will say it anyway:
I don’t think you can be passionate about politics and successfully trade politics.
Surely any sort of political persuasion you have will jeopardise your ability to read the market.
A bit like trading your fav football team.
Am I alone in this? I’m expecting a whole host of screenshots to prove I’m wrong but will take it in good humour for being a numpty
I don't agree. You can't compare it football. Anything can happen in 90 minutes whereas the fundamentals in politics are much more important. A genuine interest and knowledge is a great help imho.
On Brexit night those of that realised the importance of the early results (and that Remainer London was never going to be enough to swing it back) cleaned up.
The important thing to remember is that the broadcast media are very left wing and their coverage often amounts to wishful thinking. They had us believe Boris vs Corbyn was neck and neck. It was all crap. Corbyn couldn't even beat May at the height of his popularity so was never gonna beat Boris. I wish I'd have stuck to my guns more on that.
I remember the run up to the last election really well, it was like living in a parallel universe at times.
The polls were weighing heavy on Boris, the live debates didn’t really produce a knockout blow for either side yet social media was awash with Labour support.
Around 5pm on election night I had a feeling Corbyn might have just done enough which was the opposite I had felt all the way through up to that point.
Interestingly, the political commentators were not surprised at all by the result and when they were interviewing Joe Public and other politicians (even from the Labour Party) they knew the result was only going to end one way.
It makes me wonder if social media is really as effective as people claim. Is it just a case of vocal minority?