I really hope the app works out for you but if it doesn't you have a career as a personal trainer
The sport of kings.
Blah blah same same same.."seen the videos and read the twitter ..and still obviously have no Idea all RSA does.. the time you spent commenting in this post you could have been experts.Jukebox wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:06 pm
quit the booze!!GBDundee wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:51 pmBlah blah same same same.."seen the videos and read the twitter ..and still obviously have no Idea all RSA does.. the time you spent commenting in this post you could have been experts.Jukebox wrote: ↑Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:06 pmI've seen the videos and read the twitter. Losing favorites are celebrated as if it is a victory for the app! You created a great, updated database which that can be modelled and 'what iffed' to your hearts content and even identify runners and races that fit your selected filters for the day. You didn't rest there though - instead you encourage and sell to users the idea they should be betting by pursuing reversion to mean identified by the app - even specific enough to identify when a 4th favorite is 'due' to win. Why did you need to go there? Maybe I can guess. Whatever the reason you seem to have made that the selling point. You could have basked in the recommendations of those that had their victories using your app to model the data and humbly responded that your app helped them get to the data they wanted. The very first comment you made on this thread (that was incidently created by a forum member asking whether it would help his trading) was to insult one of our members. In fact every one of your posts on this thread has included an insult. You could have taken that opportunity and used it very differently. You've even been extended some advice and invited to give some examples by Euler - and instead this is how you respond.
You've misunderstood. I've said you've built a great app - its just that you slathered it in snake oil. All thats missing is the Martingale setter (please excuse me if I've missed it)
Imo (which isnt necessarily right) the structure of it is built around market efficiency & reversion to efficiency. I'd imagine a system could be built with structured criteria but personally I couldn't find a use for it, or maybe I couldn't be bothered.
As Euler said,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Anbell and 2 guests