Betfair chart / Betfair graph of the day

The sport of kings.
Post Reply
Korattt
Posts: 2405
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:46 pm

Dallas wrote:
Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:00 pm
This one certainly 'Travelled Lightly' in the 17:00
beat me to it
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23662
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

Here you are Dallas:
Pocket Dial, 17-55 Kilbeggan.jpg
This is an example of how early money can be indicative of a horse bouncing back.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2094
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

Derek27 wrote:
Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:54 pm
This is an example of how early money can be indicative of a horse bouncing back.
Gotta be careful when it comes to picking & choosing. I could easily find ya a counterexample.

But the idea is testable.

Does a large IP% gap between Mwap & the initial liveshow price, have an impact on SP
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23662
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

ruthlessimon wrote:
Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:59 pm
Derek27 wrote:
Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:54 pm
This is an example of how early money can be indicative of a horse bouncing back.
Gotta be careful when it comes to picking & choosing. I could easily find ya a counterexample.

But the idea is testable.

Does a large IP% gap between Mwap & the initial liveshow price, have an impact on SP
Mwap: the noise a bassline tune makes. it is not an actual word but a sound???

I've never done any detailed research on it but I've noticed off memory, which I know could be wrong, that they often do revise to the mean to some extent.

My thinking behind it is that if more than a few people are willing to back it at 6 early, there's likely to be a reason for it, and it's quite likely to be well overpriced at some stage. I know factors at the racecourse can sometimes drastically changed a horses chances, but they can't justify all the big drifts.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 24813
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Location: Bet Angel HQ

An ideal trade at Hamilton
Showout_19528339_18_21_38.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Simonlofc
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:07 am

14.00 KO now thats a steam
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Korattt
Posts: 2405
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:46 pm

Simonlofc wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:23 pm
14.00 KO now thats a steam
was gonna say that looked kind of weak money wise then I looked at the event :roll:
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5642
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

Korattt wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:41 am
Simonlofc wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:23 pm
14.00 KO now thats a steam
was gonna say that looked kind of weak money wise then I looked at the event :roll:
Was 2-2 wasn't it?

What caused the huge firm? Actual news or people thinking a fix was on?
Simonlofc
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:07 am

Naffman wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:54 am
Korattt wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:41 am
Simonlofc wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:23 pm
14.00 KO now thats a steam
was gonna say that looked kind of weak money wise then I looked at the event :roll:
Was 2-2 wasn't it?

What caused the huge firm? Actual news or people thinking a fix was on?
Id guess so, they went right out pre KO and then came right back in it looked like an Ostapenko tennis match graph
eightbo
Posts: 2166
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 8:19 pm
Location: Australia / UK

Some support that
22-07-18_1705_Bleu Et Or_17-05-58.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
eightbo
Posts: 2166
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 8:19 pm
Location: Australia / UK

Classic 3v1 in a four runner race, simplest trade of the week
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
boardrep
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:52 pm

its all starting to feel like Facebook ...................(I should have said I no longer have facebook)
Korattt
Posts: 2405
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:46 pm

eightbo wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:33 pm
Classic 3v1 in a four runner race, simplest trade of the week
indeed, well done buddy, an easy spot
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 9731
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

Korattt wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 8:00 pm
eightbo wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:33 pm
Classic 3v1 in a four runner race, simplest trade of the week
indeed, well done buddy, an easy spot
The problem with 3v1 is that you're sat looking at 3 trends that could all be about to end. Easy in hindsight, a different reality when all 3 hit support simultaneously and the full ratcheting effect hits the fav.

Oodles of strategising about how favs move, but if it's the 2nd 3rd or 4th then it seems OK to assume a trend will continue.

If you can quantify that 'easy spot' then I'll write some easy code and put my feet up.
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2094
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

ShaunWhite wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:38 pm
The problem with 3v1 is that you're sat looking at 3 trends that could all be about to end. Easy in hindsight, a different reality when all 3 hit support simultaneously and the full ratcheting effect hits the fav.

Oodles of strategising about how favs move, but if it's the 2nd 3rd or 4th then it seems OK to assume a trend will continue.

If you can quantify that 'easy spot' then I'll write some easy code and put my feet up.
Absolutely.

I deliberately designed a "forward testing" spready to test it - because it is a fairly straightforward concept (although there's a lot of combinations). I reckon it's actually backwards - but it's certainly not as good as it's touted (in its raw form).

Something I'm also looking at, is designing a spreadsheet, purely in hindsight, just to get an idea of what the most "common" displacement pattern is during a big move (i.e. -8%, +8% or -8%, 2.5%, 2.5%, 2.5% i.e. 3vs1)
Post Reply

Return to “Trading Horse racing”