Me too really kai, I fight against that word but it's so much part of the language it's hard to avoid.
Lack of 0-0's in the Premiership So Far
Stop monkeying around, this is a serious forum. Also, that's how you get lice
I can see you've been fighting the good fight judging by your post count. That's nothing short of admirable, the amount of people that get terribly "unlucky" with their trading is ridiculous at timesShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 2:00 amMe too really kai, I fight against that word but it's so much part of the language it's hard to avoid.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:10 pm
....for the fun of a couple of quid per game I may try out 0-0 in the 8 matches not with Liverpool or City though as they are goal machines......
LOST OUT just because of Villa v West Ham last night............£5 gone......
LOST OUT just because of Villa v West Ham last night............£5 gone......
Just because of Villa v West Ham? Speaking of unlucky!aidenrn810 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:53 amLOST OUT just because of Villa v West Ham last night............£5 gone......
you will need much larger sample size to make a judgement on lack of 0-0, you say there was 2, average should be maybe 4, will be easier to analyse if there is a general trend towards more goals scored by looking at average goals scored per match or percentage of over 2,5 goals per match as its closer to 50/50. low percentage bets will need much larger sample size to draw any conclusions. if you got average odds 100 and wins 5 times out of a 100 means nothing