Oh I agree, however Messi doesn't come out of it smelling of roses and innocence either. I don't quite agree with Kai, in that his legacy will be destroyed by going to a sportswashing club, and I don't fully agree with Pat either, in that he doesn't owe Barca anything. They "made" him and have generally moved heaven and earth to cater to him, and he does owe them imho. His legacy will be tarnished to some extent.Naffman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:01 amIt already looks bad for Barca but they will destroy their reputation and his legacy if they force it to court which I don't think they want.Kafkaesque wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2020 11:51 pmAs I understand it (ie. read it when the story started), the clause stated that he could leave for free, if he requested to leave by the end of May. He's now claiming that date's null and void. That it instead should be end of August, because the season ended in August, not May. Sounds dodgy at best. More than anything has the ring of him trying to force Barca's hand to make them let him leave for free or a small-ish fee, rather than have him on the books and going through the legal system.wearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2020 11:15 pm
Yep. if he requests the transfer. The £600 mill clause should only apply if another club puts in an official bid to trigger it...
He was part of one of the greatest teams, if not the greatest, in modern football, has won everything there is to win several times over bar with Argentina. What's he hoping to achieve by going to City? It makes zero sense to me. If he's fed up and wants a new challenge, fine. The emphasis should be on challenge though. Go to an also-ran team to show that he's as brilliant as he's percieved, even with no Xavi and Iniesta. Roma, Napoli, Dortmund, Leicester, Spurs. Along those lines. Never going to happen, but that sort of pivot is all that makes any sense to me outside of staying put.