World Cup 2018

Football, Soccer - whatever you call it. It is the beautiful game.
Post Reply
User avatar
SeaHorseRacing
Posts: 2893
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:06 pm

Dallas wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:56 pm
Ended up being one of the best opening matches I've seen

Over 500k traded between 1.01 - 1.03 on the Under4.5 market
Great game. Think Russia been non triers of late. Lol. Don’t think Saudi were awful, although not great would say Russia possible semi finalist. There going to be tough to beat at home.
spreadbetting
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm

They'll be shown up for how poor they really are once they meet the better teams, they were just lucky Saudi were so poor. Always a better WC when the home team progresses but that 5-0 flatters them.
dt888
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:25 pm

SeaHorseRacing wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:06 pm
Dallas wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:56 pm
Ended up being one of the best opening matches I've seen

Over 500k traded between 1.01 - 1.03 on the Under4.5 market
Great game. Think Russia been non triers of late. Lol. Don’t think Saudi were awful, although not great would say Russia possible semi finalist. There going to be tough to beat at home.
I wouldn't read too much into their chances of reaching a semi final based on that game. Possible opponents before that stage include Spain, Portugal, France and Argentina
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

Deciding game of that group will definitely be Egypt vs Russia imo

Everyone beats the saudis
dt888
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:25 pm

Looks like the 2026 World Cup will be 16 groups of 3 with top 2 going into an extra knock out round of 32.

Obviously last group matches can't be played at the same time then, so I guess we could get the odd tip tap 0-0 draw if it would qualify both teams

Seems like because of this they are even considering penalty shoot outs at 90 mins in the group games
dt888
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:25 pm

Dallas wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:16 pm
It just occurred to me how close we were to hosting this WC and the feeling at the time when the results were announced!
Yes, our bid seemed to be so much better than anyone elses that if there wasn't all the corruption going on I'm sure we would now be watching a World Cup in England now. Such a shame
User avatar
SeaHorseRacing
Posts: 2893
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:06 pm

It’s a bit like the FA Cup. Honestly don’t see the point in the replay... just go to extra and penalty’s. But suppose it’s about revenue... probably the reason why Fifa are going 48 teams.
User avatar
LeTiss
Posts: 5386
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:04 pm

I don't think our bid was that great tbh

3 of the proposed stadiums in the south were Ashton Gate, Home Park, Stadium MK - clubs where they struggle to fill their own stadiums now, let alone with increased capacity for FIFA approval

The other one was Pompey - their bid was a pack of lies, as they didn't have any money to build a stadium anyway, they just wanted WC investment to cover their asses
User avatar
BetScalper
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm

90% of the premier league's stadium's would have been good enough to stage all the games with Wembley hosting the final. Brighton now has excellent facilities etc.

Canada, USA and Mexico. Are you kidding me. Apart from Mexico then none of the other population's even know what football/soccer is.

Its just Fifa, doing what they normally do, loading their pockets.

Corruption on a massive scale.

With a looming trade war between those 3 are can't see this ending well.

What's next, India ??????????
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 9731
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

The 94 tournament in the states wasn't too bad actually, apart from us not being there. I was just reminding myself about it and found....

it broke the World Cup average attendance record with nearly 69,000 spectators per game, a mark that still stands. The total attendance of nearly 3.6 million for the final tournament remains the highest in World Cup history, despite the expansion of the competition from 24 to 32 teams (and from 52 to 64 games) in the 1998 World Cup.

They're into 'soccer' a lot more these days so I'm sure they'll put on a good show. Not so sure about Canada though and diluting it across 3 countries will no doubt increase the headcount on the pointless pundit gravy train.

I'm glad Mexico are involved, they could never hold a full one themselves and Lineker was top goal scorer there in 86 so that's a good omen.
User avatar
BetScalper
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm

What's the time difference between USA, Canada and Mexico ?

Does that mean we be watching games throughout the night European time ?
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 22674
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm
Location: Working From Home

BetScalper wrote:
Fri Jun 15, 2018 1:37 am
What's the time difference between USA, Canada and Mexico ?

Does that mean we be watching games throughout the night European time ?
Its 3hrs between east to west (New York to LA) but those same time zones also cover Canada and Mexico

US East coast is 5hrs behind us and the west coast 8hrs
User avatar
SeaHorseRacing
Posts: 2893
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:06 pm

Will be similar to Brazil World Cup I’d imagine. Japan/Korea world Cup was worse getting up at 6 am to watch a football game wasn’t easy... wait till Australia get one :lol:
User avatar
Cards37
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 7:40 am
Location: Canberra, Australia

SeaHorseRacing wrote:
Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:54 am
Will be similar to Brazil World Cup I’d imagine. Japan/Korea world Cup was worse getting up at 6 am to watch a football game wasn’t easy... wait till Australia get one :lol:
Haha that will never happen the way FIFA currently is
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 24701
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Location: Bet Angel HQ

I fancy going in 2026, after all I'll probably be dead by the time FIFA actually give us a shot at hosting it.
Post Reply

Return to “Football trading”