You know how there can sometimes be a gap between the back and lay prices ... how can that be set as a Condition within an Automation rule when looking for a qualifier that meets all other conditions? I am going to be out today and want to set up a simple Rule to stop placing any bet if the gap is wider than 2 ticks e.g. if the Back price is say 2.00 then only place a bet if the Lay price is 2.02 or 2.04. If the gap is more than 2 ticks then wait X seconds and look again. It is an All Selections criteria.I have tried using the Relative Odds condition by saying "The selection's [Back price] is [greater than] the [Lay price] of [ANY selection] [minus] [3] [ticks]" but am finding "ANY selection" literally means any selection and not "The selection" so if we have a runner Lay priced at say 2 then any (other) runner will qualify if it's back price is more than 1.97! The comparison behaves Market specific and not Runner specific).
I was wondering how I might achieve a Runner specific condition without needing a rule for every runner?
). The reason is I sometimes get caught out by placing a back bet say 2 ticks above reverse price but if there is a 3 tick gap you are effectively placing the bet 5 ticks above current back price and may never be matched unless the price swings.
, I skimmed your post. Yes , to the best of my knowledge, you need to specify a runner as Dallas says-either by favouritism, row or by nomination