I'd be surprised if cost of living in UK is less than AUS. £24k in the UK is not sufficient to be self supporting (if you want to live on your own & buy a flat for example). My son was doing a backpacking trip of Australia last year and picked up a "bar" job in melbourne which paid $48k plus pension benefits - you wont get something like that in the UK !Aarondewit wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 4:06 amI've seen a few comments on the news about how poorly nurses and teachers are paid in the UK. I assumed it was garbage so I had a look.
In Australia ordinary nurses and teachers reach the top pay scale in 6-7 years. In my state once a nurse reaches this point they take home £35,461 after tax (plus $3,742 pension contribution). A teacher £39,652 after tax (plus £4,309 pension contribution).
From my quick search, the equivalent nurse in the UK (outside of London) earns £24,042 after tax and teacher £31,175 after tax.
Is cost of living that much cheaper in the UK to explain the otherwise weird discrepancy? The exchange rate is also fairly unfavourable at the moment.
Coronavirus - A pale horse,4 men and ....beer
-
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
-
- Posts: 3217
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
- Location: Newport
Public sector workers in the UK have traditionally never been paid a good wage. Why ?, probably because compared to Australia there are so many of them over here. There are roughly 6 million of them compared to 2 million in Australia and giving them all a pay rise would cost allot of dosh.Aarondewit wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 4:06 amI've seen a few comments on the news about how poorly nurses and teachers are paid in the UK. I assumed it was garbage so I had a look.
In Australia ordinary nurses and teachers reach the top pay scale in 6-7 years. In my state once a nurse reaches this point they take home £35,461 after tax (plus $3,742 pension contribution). A teacher £39,652 after tax (plus £4,309 pension contribution).
From my quick search, the equivalent nurse in the UK (outside of London) earns £24,042 after tax and teacher £31,175 after tax.
Is cost of living that much cheaper in the UK to explain the otherwise weird discrepancy? The exchange rate is also fairly unfavourable at the moment.
The majority of people in the armed forces over here are paid less than the minimum wage when you take into account that effecively there are on call 24/7.
- Kafkaesque
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:20 am
65-ish million people in the UK with 6 million in the public sector vs 25-ish in Australia and 2 million doesn't exactly scream that's the reason.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 9:33 amPublic sector workers in the UK have traditionally never been paid a good wage. Why ?, probably because compared to Australia there are so many of them over here. There are roughly 6 million of them compared to 2 million in Australia and giving them all a pay rise would cost allot of dosh.Aarondewit wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 4:06 amI've seen a few comments on the news about how poorly nurses and teachers are paid in the UK. I assumed it was garbage so I had a look.
In Australia ordinary nurses and teachers reach the top pay scale in 6-7 years. In my state once a nurse reaches this point they take home £35,461 after tax (plus $3,742 pension contribution). A teacher £39,652 after tax (plus £4,309 pension contribution).
From my quick search, the equivalent nurse in the UK (outside of London) earns £24,042 after tax and teacher £31,175 after tax.
Is cost of living that much cheaper in the UK to explain the otherwise weird discrepancy? The exchange rate is also fairly unfavourable at the moment.
The majority of people in the armed forces over here are paid less than the minimum wage when you take into account that effecively there are on call 24/7.
Are the nurses in Andorra stacking up all their cash because it's so cheap to hand out since there's so few of them
-
- Posts: 3217
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
- Location: Newport
So why do you think public sector workers have always been under valued and under paid in the UK, its been the same for many decades regardless of which party was in power ?Kafkaesque wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 11:48 am65-ish million people in the UK with 6 million in the public sector vs 25-ish in Australia and 2 million doesn't exactly scream that's the reason.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 9:33 amPublic sector workers in the UK have traditionally never been paid a good wage. Why ?, probably because compared to Australia there are so many of them over here. There are roughly 6 million of them compared to 2 million in Australia and giving them all a pay rise would cost allot of dosh.Aarondewit wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 4:06 amI've seen a few comments on the news about how poorly nurses and teachers are paid in the UK. I assumed it was garbage so I had a look.
In Australia ordinary nurses and teachers reach the top pay scale in 6-7 years. In my state once a nurse reaches this point they take home £35,461 after tax (plus $3,742 pension contribution). A teacher £39,652 after tax (plus £4,309 pension contribution).
From my quick search, the equivalent nurse in the UK (outside of London) earns £24,042 after tax and teacher £31,175 after tax.
Is cost of living that much cheaper in the UK to explain the otherwise weird discrepancy? The exchange rate is also fairly unfavourable at the moment.
The majority of people in the armed forces over here are paid less than the minimum wage when you take into account that effecively there are on call 24/7.
Are the nurses in Andorra stacking up all their cash because it's so cheap to hand out since there's so few of them
-
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
New cases are well down too
- Kafkaesque
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:20 am
I don't have sufficient insight into the inner workings of British politics to give any sort of qualified answer.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 12:02 pmSo why do you think public sector workers have always been under valued and under paid in the UK, its been the same for many decades regardless of which party was in power ?Kafkaesque wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 11:48 am65-ish million people in the UK with 6 million in the public sector vs 25-ish in Australia and 2 million doesn't exactly scream that's the reason.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 9:33 am
Public sector workers in the UK have traditionally never been paid a good wage. Why ?, probably because compared to Australia there are so many of them over here. There are roughly 6 million of them compared to 2 million in Australia and giving them all a pay rise would cost allot of dosh.
The majority of people in the armed forces over here are paid less than the minimum wage when you take into account that effecively there are on call 24/7.
Are the nurses in Andorra stacking up all their cash because it's so cheap to hand out since there's so few of them
My simple point was that, as much as I don't know the answer, I'm fairly confident that it isn't found by looking at something as basic as absolute numbers (in employment). The UK has veered much more to one side with regards to public vs private sectors and ideological starting point than most western European countries, and I suspect the answer is hiding somewhere in that dynamic, but the finer points of how the, relative to other countries, salary numbers got to there, I won't pretend to have the faintest of ideas about.
Infection rate (or 'R' number) is supposed to be between 0.7-1.0 now, compared to 3.0+ at the time of lockdownNaffman wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 12:24 pmNew cases are well down too
I try and watch the daily briefings but some days the bods roled out to actually give it come across at least to me with varying levels of confidence, standing at the podium and addressing the viewers.
Dominic Raab and Jonathan Van Tam I find particularly good.
It would be my preference to have the same bods do it every day too.
Dominic Raab and Jonathan Van Tam I find particularly good.
It would be my preference to have the same bods do it every day too.
I've stopped watching them now, I prefere to capture and look at the data i can find and draw my own conclusions rather than listening to the sound bites - like the peak on 8th April, it was clear by around the 15th certainly by the 20th from the govt data that was the day it peaked, yet it wasn't officially said on the daily press statement until around 6th/7th May by BorisAtho55 wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 12:59 pmI try and watch the daily briefings but some days the bods roled out to actually give it come across at least to me with varying levels of confidence, standing at the podium and addressing the viewers.
Dominic Raab and Jonathan Van Tam I find particularly good.
It would be my preference to have the same bods do it every day too.
-
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
The R number can be a bit misleading on its own though - its a measure of whether the number of infections is increasing or decreasing but doesn't really tell you much about number of cases already in population - I was thinking of the number of new infections then & now... If 90% of the population had the virus the R number would be very low indeed as no new people to infect!