Stoopid idea - Scalextric Controllers
Does anybody know if they will work with BetAngel???
For those obsessed with speed
Will work on the Human Benchmark reaction and memory improvement games.
Current best scores:
Reaction Time Avg: 284.0ms now down to 189.0ms in top 40
Number Memory: Scored 10 improved to level 13
Visual Memory: 4471 now improved to 8018
Verbal Memory: 36 now 47.
Practice makes perfect.
I will work on improving these skills.
My weakest test is the visual memory squares, although
you can see my score is improving.
Reaction and memory are the ones I'm focussing at improving.
Will be interesting after 30 days practice 2 x 20min sessions
what improvements can be made.
Current best scores:
Reaction Time Avg: 284.0ms now down to 189.0ms in top 40
Number Memory: Scored 10 improved to level 13
Visual Memory: 4471 now improved to 8018
Verbal Memory: 36 now 47.
Practice makes perfect.
I will work on improving these skills.
My weakest test is the visual memory squares, although
you can see my score is improving.
Reaction and memory are the ones I'm focussing at improving.
Will be interesting after 30 days practice 2 x 20min sessions
what improvements can be made.
Last edited by drans33 on Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:05 am, edited 4 times in total.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
My PC is an i7 @ 3.5GHz, my brain is an 8086DavDvo wrote:Tried on two computers - laptop with slow cpu (pentium) about 260 ms average from many runs and fast cpu computer (core I5) with average 210 ms (several times below 200ms) so sorry to say but the results are heavily computer dependent and thus uncomparable...
Gazuty does say in his OP that results will vary unless everyone does it from the same comp so was only ment as a bit of fun, but it is becoming quiet addictive as i keep trying to beat mine every so oftenDavDvo wrote:Tried on two computers - laptop with slow cpu (pentium) about 260 ms average from many runs and fast cpu computer (core I5) with average 210 ms (several times below 200ms) so sorry to say but the results are heavily computer dependent and thus uncomparable...
- SeaHorseRacing
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:06 pm
Ok.
When i frst tried it out I was using my mobile and I managed to average 350ms.
My PC is super fast over 2 grands worth of kit and I just managed to average 223ms.
So I have to agree. Quite addictive this!!
When i frst tried it out I was using my mobile and I managed to average 350ms.
My PC is super fast over 2 grands worth of kit and I just managed to average 223ms.
So I have to agree. Quite addictive this!!
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:02 pm
252ms average for me, need to work on this. Thought I was better than this.
Nah it's not really fair because I have a competitive esports background And still sometimes maintain the sharpness in competitive shooters and aim trainers like Aim Lab
For comparison a young pro gamer will have 150ms on average while the average person around 200ish, so since everyone that competes is capped around the same reaction time it's nowhere near as important as things like mouse aim and tracking.
But Derek shouldn't have 399ms, must be pissed or something, there is no way he is that slow!
I see what the problem was. I was using my touchpad instead of the click buttons, which I never use.
The typing test should be interesting. I used to do 40/50 words per minute.
The typing test should be interesting. I used to do 40/50 words per minute.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.