Perhaps you are only reading the national verdict, everyone in the world boxing know that Joshua robbed the gold. The italian was better on all rounds. I thought because the olimpic games were in London they suppose to be the most fair ever, but I was totally wrong. Britain recieved too many benefits. It's the usuall disgrace I find in sports and yet London confirmed the same sht.
mugsgame wrote:giulio2010 wrote:Anthony Joshua robbed the gold. He was giving the victory only because is British. Disgrace on the Olimpics.......Disgrace on the organisation.......
His nationality has nothing to do with him winning. Not sure where the judges are from but pretty sure they are from different Countrys. These events are so scrutinised it would be obvious if they were wrong.
British sport is the straightest in the world. None of our Football teams have been sanction for match fixing
Sorry Fella you made a ill judged comment there.
superfrank wrote:just watched the fight on the web and it looked a very close call which is how the judges scored it (and the loser didn't seem to have any complaints).
It was not a close call, Joshua was dominated in all rounds. The loser made a formal complain and asked the judges to revisits the points because he felt he was robbed and there was strong evidence he scored more points. However it will not end here. It was so scandales and in the front of the world eyes that I am confident there will be an investigation about the verdict. I have no doubt you may disagree but in life supporting a dirty game don't feel good, winning fairly, it does feel good....