50 A Day System
I agree with all that is said about the system of laying favourites with martingale staking plan however I cant believe we are missing the obvious and without giving the game away I will just say think about what the majority of people do and think the opposite .. I make a good profit along these lines and it is so simple and there is no danger so think NOT 2.4.8.16.32.64.128.256.etc more 2.4.6.8.10.12.14.16.18.20.etc no problems you will see it now I should think ....
There are two laws of probability that govern any loss recovering staking plan, such as the Martingale.
1) If you place bets that have a lesser chance of winning than the odds imply, you are guaranteed to lose long term.
2) Obviously, the more you bet, the more you lose!
Increasing stakes to recover losses usually makes a profit in the short term, but this only hides the folly of carrying out the system to its disastrous end.
Mathematically, if you're trying to double your bank on the roulette table, you actually have a much better chance of success by placing the lot on red or black and hoping for the best (not that I'm recommending it), than using the old Martingale system.
1) If you place bets that have a lesser chance of winning than the odds imply, you are guaranteed to lose long term.
2) Obviously, the more you bet, the more you lose!
Increasing stakes to recover losses usually makes a profit in the short term, but this only hides the folly of carrying out the system to its disastrous end.
Mathematically, if you're trying to double your bank on the roulette table, you actually have a much better chance of success by placing the lot on red or black and hoping for the best (not that I'm recommending it), than using the old Martingale system.
Euler the way I make my money is backing favbourites in play or back what becomes the favourite in play and i get it right more often than not however what I mean is if i lose the stake say £10 then i back in the next race £20 which is the stake plus the stake I lost and if that loses then I back the next race at £30 which is the £10 stake plus the £20 I have lost before ....you see the difference ??
Its NOT 10 20 40 80n 160 320
It is 10 20 30 40 50
a VAST difference and its because we are backing and not laying
plus we are not restricted to the layers 100% profir on eack bet
we can hit the button at 2 or 2.5 or 3.3
and if challenged late by another horse you can back that and either negate a loss or win a smaller profit
I can say that for an example it is quite easy doing this to make 50% of your bank a week on a regulkar basis
ie bank of £2000 makes £1000 per week ...nice money and of course thats only a reletavely small bank
I hope this helps
Its NOT 10 20 40 80n 160 320
It is 10 20 30 40 50
a VAST difference and its because we are backing and not laying
plus we are not restricted to the layers 100% profir on eack bet
we can hit the button at 2 or 2.5 or 3.3
and if challenged late by another horse you can back that and either negate a loss or win a smaller profit
I can say that for an example it is quite easy doing this to make 50% of your bank a week on a regulkar basis
ie bank of £2000 makes £1000 per week ...nice money and of course thats only a reletavely small bank
I hope this helps
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm
Maybe you could post up some screenshots of your winnings threedogs to make it all a bit clearer to see the win/loss expectations
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
It's basically a scaled down variant of the Martingale - it is still increasing stakes to recover losses and no other reason. Whether your previous bet wins or loses it should have no bearing on your next bet. You would probably do just a well by picking a random stake between 10 and 50 !threedogs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:39 amEuler the way I make my money is backing favbourites in play or back what becomes the favourite in play and i get it right more often than not however what I mean is if i lose the stake say £10 then i back in the next race £20 which is the stake plus the stake I lost and if that loses then I back the next race at £30 which is the £10 stake plus the £20 I have lost before ....you see the difference ??
Its NOT 10 20 40 80n 160 320
It is 10 20 30 40 50
a VAST difference and its because we are backing and not laying
plus we are not restricted to the layers 100% profir on eack bet
we can hit the button at 2 or 2.5 or 3.3
and if challenged late by another horse you can back that and either negate a loss or win a smaller profit
I can say that for an example it is quite easy doing this to make 50% of your bank a week on a regulkar basis
ie bank of £2000 makes £1000 per week ...nice money and of course thats only a reletavely small bank
I hope this helps
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
The top 10 guys on here must have over 100yrs trading experience between them, I promise you that they do not miss the obvious. If you think you've found something new then I'm afraid you're deluding yourself.
You really need to focus on trading rather than looking for a magic betting system. The way to a guarenteed profit is to spend as long learning something difficult as you do looking for something easy.
- Crazyskier
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:36 pm
How absolutely accurate this is! I know - I learned the hard way!
CS
Ditt-dohCrazyskier wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:07 pmHow absolutely accurate this is! I know - I learned the hard way!
CS
" However, if you were thinking of £50 a Trade, you would have made £1250 today."
please sign me up for this right now. Thats £8,750 a week £35,000 a month and over £3000,000 a year . wow and thats just laying at evens and using a loss recovery . peter webb cancel all your seminars they arent needed . we have found the golden egg, yeeha las vegas here we come
please sign me up for this right now. Thats £8,750 a week £35,000 a month and over £3000,000 a year . wow and thats just laying at evens and using a loss recovery . peter webb cancel all your seminars they arent needed . we have found the golden egg, yeeha las vegas here we come
i tried this system with a 100 bank on football trading and it went as high as 450+ but then i had like 5 or 6 losses in a row and my bank went down to 60 and i stopped lol.
nice in theory but the recovery is scary. if you lose 30 one game, next bet you would stake 60 and so on so you can imagine how quickly the losses add up.
nice in theory but the recovery is scary. if you lose 30 one game, next bet you would stake 60 and so on so you can imagine how quickly the losses add up.
Loss recovery systems, just don't work. Avoid any system that using any form of loss recovery. Gambling commission guidelines ban the use or recommendation of loss recovery systems, so we deliberately don't put it in the product or advocate them.