It? It being somethng you found in the data or a gut feeling ?
Deploying being the key word? Because if 'it' was something you found in the old data, then finding the opposite in the old data would be self fulfilling, pointless? So you look forthe "anti-it" also occuring in the newest data being collected first, not just more 'it'. Because doing so tests that the opposite is evident asap, rather than immediately trying to benefit from an assertion you haven't confirmed?
I must say this is where I struggle.
So if "it" was a strategy to back then lay, you'd lay then back ? To see if would lose ? or if you were backing in races <1m you'd try backing in races >1m.
Therefore, proving 'not it' is false, as confirmation of your theory that 'it' is true? Double confirmation.
....I feel like I'm panning for gold.
If I never make trading pay 'well' I'll be utterly crushed because I've never worked or thought about something so hard, as I have in this last year. Must have put in about 3000hrs but still feel like I've only reached the six-chair-challenge