VPS CPU Speed
Some of it depends on what you are trying to benchmark. But all VPS's can't really be considered desktop machines, they were not built for that. Desktops often have dedicated GPU's which will radically change benchmarking performance.
Guess it depends what you are trying to do. We have higher spec ones planned shortly but, obviously, they will be more expensive.
You can spec up a vps to whatever standard you wish, but the sky is the limit in terms of cost on that front. Again it depends on exactly what you are looking for.
I run lots of automated stuff on SS and don't' experience any problems, but I understand that wont completely suit everybody's needs.
You can spec up a vps to whatever standard you wish, but the sky is the limit in terms of cost on that front. Again it depends on exactly what you are looking for.
I run lots of automated stuff on SS and don't' experience any problems, but I understand that wont completely suit everybody's needs.
A couple of years ago, I tested a Dedicated v Virtual (the dedicated being more expensive)..and the virtual was faster to betfair..
by all means; test it yourself, but would be interested if you would post your results/findings..
Thanks
Regards
Peter
by all means; test it yourself, but would be interested if you would post your results/findings..
Thanks
Regards
Peter
I can vouch for the fact that disk speed can make a huge difference to the experience of using a remote server. I've found that a VPS backed by an SSD is far more responsive than a dedicated server on a magnetic disk.
Whether this translates into much of a performance difference when running things like automated betting programs or BetAngel is another question though.
I'd say your latency to the exchange is more important, unless you're running highly CPU intensive or disk r/w intensive tasks.
Whether this translates into much of a performance difference when running things like automated betting programs or BetAngel is another question though.
I'd say your latency to the exchange is more important, unless you're running highly CPU intensive or disk r/w intensive tasks.
Yeah, it shouldn't take 200ms, although opening the file initially will take longer than writing to it subsequently. You should try retaining a handle to the file and see if it continues to take that long with subsequent writes.
You can also try writing to the logs asynchronously so that your program doesn't block while that's happening and can get on with other stuff.
If writing does prove to be constantly slow, I would definitely recommend getting a VPS backed by SSD.
You can also try writing to the logs asynchronously so that your program doesn't block while that's happening and can get on with other stuff.
If writing does prove to be constantly slow, I would definitely recommend getting a VPS backed by SSD.
I benchmarked my vps hard drive using hdtune software and compared it to my home computer with a standard hard drive.
VPS Hard Drive
Transfer Rate:
Minimum: .1 MB/sec
Maximum: 62.8 MB/sec
Mean: 19.9 MB/sec
Access Time 87.6 Milliseconds
Burst Rate 33.2 MB/second
My standard home hdd drive:
Transfer Rate:
Minimum: 35.8 MB/sec
Maximum: 141.1 MB/sec
Mean: 108.3 MB/sec
Access Time 17.0 Milliseconds
Burst Rate 125.9 MB/second
VPS Hard Drive
Transfer Rate:
Minimum: .1 MB/sec
Maximum: 62.8 MB/sec
Mean: 19.9 MB/sec
Access Time 87.6 Milliseconds
Burst Rate 33.2 MB/second
My standard home hdd drive:
Transfer Rate:
Minimum: 35.8 MB/sec
Maximum: 141.1 MB/sec
Mean: 108.3 MB/sec
Access Time 17.0 Milliseconds
Burst Rate 125.9 MB/second
Euler wrote:I was going to get somebody to contact you through sporting servers, but your details here don't match anything over there?
Thanks for following up with me. I am going to try to improve my program first and do some more benchmarks before getting a dedicated server.