Yeah I noticed that from looking at the stats. Do you think laying the field is worthwhile pursuing?
Lay the field - any stats available to assist?
- northbound
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:22 pm
Like most strategies as a blanket approach it wont be, but if you dig the data you will find the courses (couple of Irish courses are very good for it), distances & race types its most suited to, also the optimal odds to lay can differ
Apologies if this post is repeated. I swore I replied to this thread this morning and submitted but the post doesn't seem to have gone through. Anyway...
I have experimented a little with this strategy possibly around 100 races and I must say IMVHO it is a very risky strategy for a number of reasons. Fortunately I've only experimented with small stakes. I've tended to focus mostly on races up to 7f with a minimum of 10 runners. My experiences and observations are:
1) It is staggerging how often even in a big competitive field (6/1 the field) you are often only matched on one horse at odds on say 1.5. Even trying to lay the field at 2/1 you may only get 2 matched resulting in a small loss, on rare occasions get 3 matched just breaking even.
2) I've observed quite a few races where there have been several horses across the track 2 or 3 furlongs out battling away looked at my betfair screen expecting to see a green up only to see that one horse is already odds on and goes on to win by a a few lengths.
3) I've had the odd race where there was a tight photo finish yet only one of the two runners in the photo traded odds on (the winner). I even had one race where there was a close finish between the favourite and a longshot even though the distance was a nose the longshot won in the photo but only the favourite traded odds on!
4)What I believe is happening is that there are many professionals operating on course and they are in an excellent position to see what is happening with no picture delay like you have off course. They are probably only betting in the last 50 yards of a race where by then you have a clear winner.
I have experimented a little with this strategy possibly around 100 races and I must say IMVHO it is a very risky strategy for a number of reasons. Fortunately I've only experimented with small stakes. I've tended to focus mostly on races up to 7f with a minimum of 10 runners. My experiences and observations are:
1) It is staggerging how often even in a big competitive field (6/1 the field) you are often only matched on one horse at odds on say 1.5. Even trying to lay the field at 2/1 you may only get 2 matched resulting in a small loss, on rare occasions get 3 matched just breaking even.
2) I've observed quite a few races where there have been several horses across the track 2 or 3 furlongs out battling away looked at my betfair screen expecting to see a green up only to see that one horse is already odds on and goes on to win by a a few lengths.
3) I've had the odd race where there was a tight photo finish yet only one of the two runners in the photo traded odds on (the winner). I even had one race where there was a close finish between the favourite and a longshot even though the distance was a nose the longshot won in the photo but only the favourite traded odds on!
4)What I believe is happening is that there are many professionals operating on course and they are in an excellent position to see what is happening with no picture delay like you have off course. They are probably only betting in the last 50 yards of a race where by then you have a clear winner.
- northbound
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:22 pm
Indeed.
My advice, if you are into Lay The Field strategies, is to focus on other sports. Golf for example.
You can download historical data for sports from data.betfair.com, although it’s a bit more complex to import and analyse.
My advice, if you are into Lay The Field strategies, is to focus on other sports. Golf for example.
You can download historical data for sports from data.betfair.com, although it’s a bit more complex to import and analyse.
The sort of races best suited to this strategy arn't competitive races with close finishes, but races where the complexion of the race changes. I would imagine NH races would be better for obvious reasons.
I've traded on a lot of races where several horses traded under 1.5, but I've never counted the ones that didn't or paid much attention to it.
If you lay the field at 1.4, you need to get two bets matched 40% of the time just to break even, although this will be reduced if you can get 3 matched. I don't think realistically that you can achieve a substantially higher success rate than what you need to break even so I doubt there's much of a profit margin in the strategy.
Good luck anyway with the research.
I've traded on a lot of races where several horses traded under 1.5, but I've never counted the ones that didn't or paid much attention to it.
If you lay the field at 1.4, you need to get two bets matched 40% of the time just to break even, although this will be reduced if you can get 3 matched. I don't think realistically that you can achieve a substantially higher success rate than what you need to break even so I doubt there's much of a profit margin in the strategy.
Good luck anyway with the research.
That's an interesting point Derek27 however in order to get matched at odds on or even at 2/1 the complextion of the race does indeed need to change a few times however in my honest opinion if your'e looking at either code of racing and you have laid the field odds on it's still only likely you'll be matched if one horse really looks the winner and gets headed in the last few yards and that simply doesn't happen enough times to be profitable. In that very example you may have been matched on both at 2/1 but again that's no good. Like I said I've even seen it where a horse was literally joined on the line but still only one of them traded odds on.
There are a few old videos now on youtube touting this as a good system but again IMO misleading for aforementioned reasons.
Another thing I should say when I've been to watch racing live you can see a small group of horses clear of the field in the final furlong and you can often see the winner going best and that the others won't trouble it. Whereas when I've later gone into the bar and seen the replay on the racecourse tv it looks like the second horse had a chance. so on course bettors have that advantage also they don't have the picture delay.
Also the nature of jump racing including bumpers you will more likely get longer margin winners. if the complextion changes a few times in the last furlong you'll need 4 horses to be flip flopping the lead to get them all matched at 2/1, for odds on again your'e more likely to get a clear winner in the last 50 yards.
there are also other risks even with flat racing where if you attempt the strategy in a really big field say over 20 runners there may be too many for punters to focus on but even these big fields can have runaway winners. also the danger is that the big field splits into groups with one group clear of the others so what was a 24 runner field has effectively become an 8 runner group with 1 or 2 going best.
Lastly I should say IMO in running betting and even the betting exchanges are not exploited enough by the general off course public, the liquidity during live races is often quite thin with only tens of pounds available at any one time on anything but the trailers. The market really only comes to life at the business end where the on course professionalls mop up.
Having said all this no doubt there are a few people who have a handle on laying the field.
There are a few old videos now on youtube touting this as a good system but again IMO misleading for aforementioned reasons.
Another thing I should say when I've been to watch racing live you can see a small group of horses clear of the field in the final furlong and you can often see the winner going best and that the others won't trouble it. Whereas when I've later gone into the bar and seen the replay on the racecourse tv it looks like the second horse had a chance. so on course bettors have that advantage also they don't have the picture delay.
Also the nature of jump racing including bumpers you will more likely get longer margin winners. if the complextion changes a few times in the last furlong you'll need 4 horses to be flip flopping the lead to get them all matched at 2/1, for odds on again your'e more likely to get a clear winner in the last 50 yards.
there are also other risks even with flat racing where if you attempt the strategy in a really big field say over 20 runners there may be too many for punters to focus on but even these big fields can have runaway winners. also the danger is that the big field splits into groups with one group clear of the others so what was a 24 runner field has effectively become an 8 runner group with 1 or 2 going best.
Lastly I should say IMO in running betting and even the betting exchanges are not exploited enough by the general off course public, the liquidity during live races is often quite thin with only tens of pounds available at any one time on anything but the trailers. The market really only comes to life at the business end where the on course professionalls mop up.
Having said all this no doubt there are a few people who have a handle on laying the field.
- BetScalper
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm
Pick race tracks that have a short run in to the finish line off the bend.
- BetScalper
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm
Not in 5f, 6f, 7f handicap races without odds on favourites.
IF the handicapper has done his/her job properly then in theory they should all finish together. Obviously that doesn't happen very often but coming off the bend with a short run in will cause on-course traders and fast picture punters to cause havoc in the markets by pulling monies one side or the other. By laying the field pre-off at pre-determined odds means you will get matched quicker than trying to do it in-play with a slow feed.
Like I said, blindly laying all runners, every race will lead to no advantage and the poor house.
- 5f, 6f, 7f
- Short run in off the bend
- No odds on favourites
- Lay the field pre-off @ 50% of the favourites price
So, if the favourites price is 3 lay @ 1.5, 4 Lay @ 2.0, 5 Lay @ 2.5 etc.
Forget about trying to lay the field below 1.5. Yes it can be profitable but there is another twist which you need to take into account and if I give that away then I will be hurting my bottom line.
Use small stakes to start with until you are confident in the above. You only need about 10 races per week to make some good money once you start upsizing. But one step at a time. Pick your races, start small. Forget about becoming rich overnight. There are patterns, you need to find them and then before long you will be kicking yourself as to why you didn't think of it before!!!!!!
Goodluck,
- BetScalper
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm
Slightly different but watch a football match on your TV and have the market open on Betfair/Bet Angel etc.
You will notice the market gets suspended 1 or 2 seconds before you see the goal scored on your TV.
I use to wonder what the hell was going on.
Its because BF have people at grounds who will suspend the market asap.
On-course horse racing traders are seeing things happen well before you do sitting at home. You think your favourite horse is in the lead and cant lose, little do you know that its just been brought down or the jockeys jumped off his ride.
Yeah, I know courtsiders are a big deal in tennis. Some of them have Instagram accounts chronicling their jet set lifestyle, mixing with tennis royalty etc. Many regard it as ethically shady which I understand. A guy was arrested at the Australian Open a few years back but I think they dropped the charges in the end. That whole world of those wiseguys is fascinating to me.
- BetScalper
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm
I was arrested at a French tennis match last year, held for 17 hours and later released without charge. They trashed my iPad. It was wiped back to factory setup. When I arrived back in the UK I got a follow-up visit from London city Police. They wanted to know what I was doing at the tennis match, who I worked for and asked to see bank statements. Was a complete nightmare.jamdog wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:03 pmYeah, I know courtsiders are a big deal in tennis. Some of them have Instagram accounts chronicling their jet set lifestyle, mixing with tennis royalty etc. Many regard it as ethically shady which I understand. A guy was arrested at the Australian Open a few years back but I think they dropped the charges in the end. That whole world of those wiseguys is fascinating to me.