Betdaq

A place to discuss anything.
Post Reply
Simonlofc
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:07 am

From today 2% Commision
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
RicHep365
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:42 am

Simonlofc wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:23 am
From today 2% Commision
Just saw this, haven't they done this before then reverted to 5% again?
Simonlofc
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:07 am

Im not sure, they have had the odds offer and the saturday lunchtime Premier game has been 0% all season. Fair play to them.
User avatar
Niko
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am

Its what the market needs!
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 24816
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Location: Bet Angel HQ

What the market needs are for people to actually use Betdaq. They have run a lot of promotions, but very few people seem to stick around for much.
RalfusDawes
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:09 pm

RicHep365 wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:28 am
Just saw this, haven't they done this before then reverted to 5% again?
Yeah, pretty sure they were 2% when I joined a few years back. As Euler says, they need people to stick around. Trying to market make on some events is painful.
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5644
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

Betdaq had their chance surely. Would love them to have more liquidity but can't for the life of me see how they're going to improve from here on in.
User avatar
northbound
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:22 pm

Euler wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:15 am
What the market needs are for people to actually use Betdaq. They have run a lot of promotions, but very few people seem to stick around for much.
I used BetdaqAngel several times but am not using it regularly for trading, here's the main reason.

Let's say there is one horse currently trading at these odds: BACK 3.50, LAY 3.55.

On Betfair, if I join the queue to back it at 3.55, there's a chance I'll get matched before the price steams. Fill rate is not always great, but I often get matched.

On Betdaq, it feels as if I'll only ever get matched if the price starts to drift well past 3.55. It doesn't feel right to a trader like myself who's still on his learning journey.

Trading aside, when I dabbled in matched betting, my preference was for Smarkets because their website looks and feels much better compared to Betdaq.
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5644
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

That last statement is very interesting!

BF and smarkets look way ahead in the design of the website and I think that influences bettors somewhat.
spreadbetting
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm

They recently sent out emails aboutng shutting down the co.uk ite and asking everyone to withdraw and re-register on the com site because they couldn't just transfer funds. They made it such a pain for me to withdraw my balance, even though I'd wthdrawn from them before I can't be arsed to re-register and on to of that the co.uk site still seems to be active for me. Had probems in the past with their customers services when trying to reg cards too. They just seem inept at everything they do to me.
User avatar
LeTiss
Posts: 5386
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:04 pm

I don't even bother with Betdaq anymore. When Betfair introduced PC, a more progressive company than Betdaq, with ambitious decision makers would have stolen a significant number of Betfair's customers. They are like an old man who is frightened to fart, in case they shit themselves instead
weemac
Posts: 1240
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:16 pm

Yep, they're dead to me too. Can't get matched till you're at least a tick 'wrong' with BF prices, inefficient customer service, closed the uk site, closed to too many overseas markets. And then just try withdrawing your funds - good luck with that project.
spreadbetting
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm

weemac wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:02 pm
Yep, they're dead to me too. Can't get matched till you're at least a tick 'wrong' with BF prices, inefficient customer service, closed the uk site, closed to too many overseas markets. And then just try withdrawing your funds - good luck with that project.
Exactly the same experience as I've had with them, they've had so many chances to catch Betfair but are just too incompetent to take them. Must be loads of ex co.uk players like me who haven't bothered to resign up to the com site and they haven't even tried to get them back.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 24816
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Location: Bet Angel HQ

Hadn't realised the sentiment was so negative on Betdaq. We've supported them since the PC came into force as the only credible alternative. I'm pumped many millions through there and liquidity is better than it has been for some time. But I guess it's always going to be a catch 22 situation that Betfair will exploit.

Nobody wants to use an alternative unless there is liquidity but liquidity won't arrive till people use it, q.e.d.
RalfusDawes
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:09 pm

spreadbetting wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:06 pm
... they've had so many chances to catch Betfair but are just too incompetent to take them
Fair comment. I was looking through their FAQs about 18 months back, and they still referred to Firefox 1.x and Netscape Navigator, although I see they've now updated the info there. I keep my Betdaq account funded as a backup, and for testing spreadsheets in a 'live' market at small stakes, but I rarely put more than a few £ through the market - aside from liquidity, the API is just too far behind Betfair - no historical time/price charts, and only basic race details. How hard would it be for them to include race length and type in the API? I do wonder sometimes how they are still in business.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”