I wasn't implying anything, just stating facts.Kafkaesque wrote: ↑Mon May 28, 2018 1:22 amEven if that's said with a big wink, wink then turning the talk to armed revolution akin to civil war is just going off the deep end!BetScalper wrote: ↑Mon May 28, 2018 1:05 amOne man's villain is another man's hero.
I would think the centre/left should be more worried about the following statistics for the UK.
- 58,000 Police Officers
- 82,000 Soldiers
Assume for one moment that they are all armed (There not).
As of 2017.
- The number of private citizens holding a firearms/SGC certificate was 1.3 million
- The same number above between them hold 2.43 million firearms
By there nature most private citizens holding 1 or more firearms tend to be centre/right.
According to the maths, the government's followers (assuming they all are) are out numbered 10 to 1.
Therefore, my question to the centre/left is...
Do you feel lucky punk ?
:lol
Great use of your freedom of speech, arguing for pushing aside democracy with violence. But nice attempt to guide the conversation away from you continiously saying "well said" to uninformed BS, when I called it as such.
Oh, and Nato forces are 2 million plus, so I think, it'll be fine.
However, in the unlikely event, do you really think NATO would get involved in a UK civil war ?
NATO/UN are weak and have been for sometime. They cant agree on anything.
Besides, NATO only has a mandate for intervention if 1 of its members is attacked by an external force, not internal civil matters.