£10 returns to the cut
Start to cut - Phil Mickelson - 44 to 3.75 - £107.33
Start to cut - Henrik Stenson - 30 to 4 - £65
Start to cut - Soren Kjeldsen - 260 to 14.5 - £169.31
Start to cut - Zach Johnson - 75 to 18.5 - £30.54
Start to cut - Rory McIlroy - 12.5 to 21 - £-4.05
Start to cut - Dustin Johnson - 9.4 to 23 - £-5.91
Start to cut - Sergio Garcia - 30 to 22 - £3.64
Start to cut - Keegan Bradley - 520 to 25 - £198
Start to cut - Charl Schwartzel - 65 to 34 - £9.12
Start to cut - Martin Kaymer - 48 to 55 - £-1.27
Start to cut - Matt Kuchar - 70 to 65 - £0.77
Start to cut - Rickie Fowler - 40 to 80 - £-5
Start to cut - Rafael Cabrera-Bello - 110 to 90 - £2.22
Start to cut - Tony Finau - 320 to 80 - £30
Start to cut - Bill Haas - 410 to 95 - £33.16
Start to cut - Andrew Johnston - 800 to 100 - £70
Start to cut - Patrick Reed - 75 to 110 - £-3.18
Start to cut - Jason Day - 10.5 to 110 - £-9.05
Start to cut - Adam Scott - 22 to 150 - £-8.53
Start to cut - Kevin Na - 410 to 160 - £15.63
Open Golf 2016
- Dublin_Flyer
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:39 am
Question for ya Peter, are the prices taken at tee time or hours previous or does it vary?
Reason being a chap from work backed Stenson at 28/1 in PaddyPower or Boyles, I thought he would have been much higher on BF.
Reason being a chap from work backed Stenson at 28/1 in PaddyPower or Boyles, I thought he would have been much higher on BF.
-
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 1:43 pm
Is this list not misleading, since it suffers from Survivor's Bias? That is, it excludes all the players who didn't make the cut and therefore it conceals lots of £10 losses.
Only if you back every player, which would be illogical.shakespeare wrote:Is this list not misleading, since it suffers from Survivor's Bias? That is, it excludes all the players who didn't make the cut and therefore it conceals lots of £10 losses.
Imagine you backed 30 of them, then look at that list again.
-
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 1:43 pm
You are a god. Obviously the hard part is knowing which 30 to back.Euler wrote:Only if you back every player, which would be illogical.
Imagine you backed 30 of them, then look at that list again.
I wasn't expecting a personal reply. I thought on this forum the grownups like you talk about grownup things to each other while Dallas babysits the children (like me) and answers our tiresome questions.
Managed to show a profit on the first 3 majors of the year using this strategy. Looking to do something more interesting with the profit now coming in to the weekend, perhaps lay the fav when entering the hard part of the course or even dutching the front of the field as suggested by Peter in one of his latest blogs.
- phillywilly72
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:59 pm
Great technique but the real skill is how to pick the 20 or 30 to back! Probably recent form is the most likely way unless euler is willing to elaborate